» Articles » PMID: 19690647

Integrating Soluble Biomarkers and Imaging Technologies in the Identification of Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Patients

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2009 Aug 20
PMID 19690647
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The clinical utility of a biomarker depends on its ability to identify high-risk individuals to optimally manage the patient. A new biomarker would be of clinical value if it is accurate and reliable, provides good sensitivity and specificity, and is available for widespread application. Data are accumulating on the potential clinical utility of integrating imaging technologies and circulating biomarkers for the identification of vulnerable (high-risk) cardiovascular patients. A multi-biomarker strategy consisting of markers of inflammation, hemostasis and thrombosis, proteolysis and oxidative stress, combined with new imaging modalities (optical coherence tomography, virtual histology plus IVUS, PET) can increase our ability to identify such thombosis-prone patients. In an ideal scenario, cardiovascular biomarkers and imaging combined will provide a better diagnostic tool to identify high-risk individuals and also more efficient methods for effective therapies to reduce such cardiovascular risk. However, additional studies are required in order to show that this approach can contribute to improved diagnostic and therapeutic of atherosclerotic disease.

Citing Articles

Association of SDF1 and MMP12 with Atherosclerosis and Inflammation: Clinical and Experimental Study.

Marcos-Jubilar M, Orbe J, Roncal C, Machado F, Rodriguez J, Fernandez-Montero A Life (Basel). 2021; 11(5).

PMID: 34062730 PMC: 8147178. DOI: 10.3390/life11050414.

References
1.
Armstrong E, Morrow D, Sabatine M . Inflammatory biomarkers in acute coronary syndromes: part III: biomarkers of oxidative stress and angiogenic growth factors. Circulation. 2006; 113(8):e289-92. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595546. View

2.
Szmitko P, Wang C, Weisel R, de Almeida J, Anderson T, Verma S . New markers of inflammation and endothelial cell activation: Part I. Circulation. 2003; 108(16):1917-23. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000089190.95415.9F. View

3.
Packard C, OReilly D, Caslake M, McMahon A, Ford I, Cooney J . Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 as an independent predictor of coronary heart disease. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(16):1148-55. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200010193431603. View

4.
Baldus S, Heeschen C, Meinertz T, Zeiher A, Eiserich J, Munzel T . Myeloperoxidase serum levels predict risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2003; 108(12):1440-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000090690.67322.51. View

5.
Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Litovsky S, Willerson J, Casscells W . Finding vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques: is it worth the effort?. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24(10):1775-82. DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000142373.72662.20. View