The Inflammatory Response in Transgastric Surgery: Gastric Content Leak Leads to Localized Inflammatory Response and Higher Adhesive Disease
Overview
General Surgery
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Risk of gastric spillage during transgastric surgery is a potential complication of NOTES procedures. The aim of this study was to determine risk outcomes from gastric spillage in a rat survival model by measuring local and systemic inflammatory markers, adhesive disease, and morbidity.
Methods: We performed a minilaparotomy with needle aspiration of 2 ml of gastric contents mixed with 2 ml of sterile saline (study group, SG) or 4 ml of sterile saline (control group, CG) injected into the peritoneal cavity of 60 male rats. Inflammatory markers (TNFalpha, IL-6, and IL-10) were analyzed at 1, 3, 6, and 24 h postoperatively by obtaining plasma levels and peritoneal washings. At necropsy, the peritoneal cavity was examined grossly for adhesions.
Results: Adhesions were seen more frequently in the SG versus the CG (100% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.014). There was a significant difference in the peritoneal TNFalpha levels in the SG compared with the CG, which peaked 1 h after surgery (p < 0.02). Both peritoneal IL-6 and IL-10 levels were higher in the SG versus the CG, which peaked 3 h after surgery (p < 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). All peritoneal inflammatory markers returned to undetectable levels at 24 h for both groups. Plasma cytokines were undetectable at all time intervals.
Conclusion: The inflammatory response was found to be a localized and not systemic event, with plasma cytokine levels remaining normal while peritoneal washings revealed a brisk, short-lived localized inflammatory response. There was a significantly higher rate of adhesive disease in the SG compared with the CG; this, however did not translate into a difference in apparent clinical outcome. We conclude that gastric leakage in this NOTES rodent model induces a localized inflammatory response, followed by mild to moderate adhesive disease. This may be important in human NOTES.
Cheng S, Yang J, Song J, Cao X, Zhou B, Yang L Mater Today Bio. 2025; 30:101458.
PMID: 39866793 PMC: 11762619. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101458.
Comparison of Inflammatory Response to Transgastric and Transcolonic NOTES.
Hucl T, Benes M, Kocik M, Splichalova A, Maluskova J, Krak M Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016; 2016:7320275.
PMID: 27403157 PMC: 4923531. DOI: 10.1155/2016/7320275.
Meller Donatsky A, Holzknecht B, Arpi M, Vilmann P, Meisner S, Jorgensen L Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(6):1914-22.
PMID: 23292558 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2686-5.
Martinek J, Ryska O, Filipkova T, Dolezel R, Juhas S, Motlik J World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(27):3558-64.
PMID: 22826620 PMC: 3400857. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3558.
Transgastric large-organ extraction: the initial human experience.
Dotai T, Coker A, Antozzi L, Acosta G, Michelotti M, Bildzukewicz N Surg Endosc. 2012; 27(2):394-9.
PMID: 22806531 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2473-3.