» Articles » PMID: 19682758

Dosimetric Assessment of Static and Helical TomoTherapy in the Clinical Implementation of Breast Cancer Treatments

Overview
Journal Radiother Oncol
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2009 Aug 18
PMID 19682758
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Investigation of the use of TomoTherapy and TomoDirect versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of post-operative breast carcinoma. This study concentrates on the evaluation of the planning protocol for the TomoTherapy and TomoDirect TPS, dose verification and the implementation of in vivo dosimetry.

Materials And Methods: Eight patients with different breast cancer indications (left/right tumor, axillary nodes involvement (N+)/no nodes (N0), tumorectomy/mastectomy) were enrolled. TomoTherapy, TomoDirect and conventional plans were generated for prone and supine positions leading to six or seven plans per patient. Dose prescription was 42Gy in 15 fractions over 3weeks. Dose verification of a TomoTherapy plan is performed using TLDs and EDR2 film inside a home-made wax breast phantom fixed on a rando-alderson phantom. In vivo dosimetry was performed with TLDs.

Results: It is possible to create clinically acceptable plans with TomoTherapy and TomoDirect. TLD calibration protocol with a water equivalent phantom is accurate. TLD verification with the phantom shows measured over calculated ratios within 2.2% (PTV). An overresponse of the TLDs was observed in the low dose regions (<0.1Gy). The film measurements show good agreement for high and low dose regions inside the phantom. A sharp gradient can be created to the thoracic wall. In vivo dosimetry with TLDs was clinically feasible.

Conclusions: The TomoTherapy and TomoDirect modalities can deliver dose distributions which the radiotherapist judges to be equal to or better than conventional treatment of breast carcinoma according to the organ to be protected.

Citing Articles

Surface guided ring gantry radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold for breast cancer patients.

Kadhim M, Haraldsson A, Kugele M, Enocson H, Back S, Ceberg S J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(10):e14463.

PMID: 39138877 PMC: 11466460. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14463.


Helical tomotherapy for post-mastectomy radiation therapy with or without breast implant: a single institution experience.

Dejean R, Chaltiel L, Izar F, Chira C, Leray H, Jouve E Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022; 35:37-43.

PMID: 35591849 PMC: 9112056. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.012.


The Impact of an Incidental Dose on Axillary Tumor Control and Toxicity in Localized Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

Schmitt M, Chambrelant I, Hong Chheang P, Pflumio C, Hild C, Petit T Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(3).

PMID: 35159074 PMC: 8834453. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030807.


Cardiopulmonary-related patient-reported outcomes in a randomized clinical trial of radiation therapy for breast cancer.

Van Parijs H, Vinh-Hung V, Fontaine C, Storme G, Verschraegen C, Nguyen D BMC Cancer. 2021; 21(1):1177.

PMID: 34736429 PMC: 8569957. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08916-z.


A treatment planning comparison of contemporary photon-based radiation techniques for breast cancer.

Zeverino M, Petersson K, Kyroudi A, Jeanneret-Sozzi W, Bourhis J, Bochud F Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021; 7:32-38.

PMID: 33458403 PMC: 7807600. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.08.002.