» Articles » PMID: 19682098

Exciting but Exhausting: Experiences with Participatory Research with Chronically Ill Adolescents

Overview
Journal Health Expect
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2009 Aug 18
PMID 19682098
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Adolescents with chronic conditions are major users of paediatric hospitals, but seldom participate in the evaluation of services or in research. Little is known about the usefulness of the participatory approach in adolescent health research.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, benefits and limitations of a participatory research (PR) project involving chronically ill adolescents as co-researchers.

Design Setting And Participants: Nine adolescents, aged 15-17 years, acted as co-researchers in a hospital-based PR project. They co-developed an interview protocol and during a disco party held for this purpose interviewed each other and 25 fellow patients (12-19 years). They provided advice on the draft report and participated in the dissemination of the results, but were not involved in the design of the project or analysis of results.

Results: Involving adolescents in participatory health research was feasible and appreciated by researchers and youth alike, but had its drawbacks too. The peer-research attracted few participants, the interviews lacked depth and did not yield substantial new insights. Maintaining a high level of participation of the chronically ill co-researchers also proved difficult.

Conclusions: Adolescents with chronic conditions like to have a say in the design and evaluation of hospital services. But their participation as co-researchers demands ample resources from all parties involved without automatically improving research quality. PR does not seem the most effective and efficient way to make services more responsive. We therefore recommend further exploration of other creative and sustainable ways for involving youth in health-care service development and innovation.

Citing Articles

Attitudes and awareness in autonomous decision on medical treatment or inclusion in clinical trials amongst Slovenian adolescents: an online survey.

cernelc M, Erculj V, Grosek S BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1198.

PMID: 39443899 PMC: 11515694. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06164-w.


Co-production of health and social science research with vulnerable children and young people: A rapid review.

Erwin J, Burns L, Devalia U, Witton R, Shawe J, Wheat H Health Expect. 2024; 27(2):e13991.

PMID: 38403901 PMC: 10895074. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13991.


The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.

Spencer B, Hugh-Jones S, Cottrell D, Pini S Res Involv Engagem. 2023; 9(1):91.

PMID: 37828630 PMC: 10568929. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.


Pediatric patient engagement in clinical care, research and intervention development: a scoping review.

Teela L, Verhagen L, van Oers H, Kramer E, Daams J, Gruppen M J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023; 7(1):32.

PMID: 36988738 PMC: 10060502. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00566-y.


'it was that … specialist … that finally listened to us … that's probably a weird answer to what you were expecting': Clinician and carer perspectives on brilliant feeding care.

Dadich A, Kaplun S, Kaplun C, Hopwood N, Elliot C Health Expect. 2022; 26(1):488-497.

PMID: 36482799 PMC: 9854327. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13683.


References
1.
Abma T . Patients as partners in a health research agenda setting: the feasibility of a participatory methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006; 29(4):424-39. DOI: 10.1177/0163278706293406. View

2.
Young B, Dixon-Woods M, Windridge K, Heney D . Managing communication with young people who have a potentially life threatening chronic illness: qualitative study of patients and parents. BMJ. 2003; 326(7384):305. PMC: 143524. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7384.305. View

3.
Cargo M, Mercer S . The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008; 29:325-50. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824. View

4.
Flicker S . Who benefits from community-based participatory research? A case study of the Positive Youth Project. Health Educ Behav. 2006; 35(1):70-86. DOI: 10.1177/1090198105285927. View

5.
Caron-Flinterman J, Broerse J, Teerling J, Bunders J . Patients' priorities concerning health research: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands. Health Expect. 2005; 8(3):253-63. PMC: 5060294. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00337.x. View