» Articles » PMID: 19680225

Cargo Surface Hydrophobicity is Sufficient to Overcome the Nuclear Pore Complex Selectivity Barrier

Overview
Journal EMBO J
Date 2009 Aug 15
PMID 19680225
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To fulfil their function, nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) must discriminate between inert proteins and nuclear transport receptors (NTRs), admitting only the latter. This specific permeation is thought to depend on interactions between hydrophobic patches on NTRs and phenylalanine-glycine (FG) or related repeats that line the NPC. Here, we tested this premise directly by conjugating different hydrophobic amino-acid analogues to the surface of an inert protein and examining its ability to cross NPCs unassisted by NTRs. Conjugation of as few as four hydrophobic moieties was sufficient to enable passage of the protein through NPCs. Transport of the modified protein proceeded with rates comparable to those measured for the innate protein when bound to an NTR and was relatively insensitive both to the nature and density of the amino acids used to confer hydrophobicity. The latter observation suggests a non-specific, small, and plant interaction network between cargo and FG repeats.

Citing Articles

Comparative toxicity study of three surface-modified titanium dioxide nanoparticles following subacute inhalation.

Schaudien D, Hansen T, Tillmann T, Pohlmann G, Kock H, Creutzenberg O Part Fibre Toxicol. 2025; 22(1):5.

PMID: 39994642 PMC: 11849269. DOI: 10.1186/s12989-025-00620-1.


Charge of karyopherins and nuclear FG-Nups are key ingredients of nucleocytoplasmic transport.

Mishra A, Van der Giessen E, Onck P Biophys J. 2024; 124(2):215-226.

PMID: 39600095 PMC: 11788480. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.3313.


Regulating transport efficiency through the nuclear pore complex: The role of binding affinity with FG-Nups.

Matsuda A, Mofrad M Mol Biol Cell. 2024; 35(12):ar149.

PMID: 39475712 PMC: 11656470. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E24-05-0224.


Nuclear envelope budding and its cellular functions.

Keuenhof K, Kohler V, Broeskamp F, Panagaki D, Speese S, Buttner S Nucleus. 2023; 14(1):2178184.

PMID: 36814098 PMC: 9980700. DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2023.2178184.


Physics of the Nuclear Pore Complex: Theory, Modeling and Experiment.

Hoogenboom B, Hough L, Lemke E, Lim R, Onck P, Zilman A Phys Rep. 2022; 921:1-53.

PMID: 35892075 PMC: 9306291. DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2021.03.003.


References
1.
Kramer A, Ludwig Y, Shahin V, Oberleithner H . A pathway separate from the central channel through the nuclear pore complex for inorganic ions and small macromolecules. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282(43):31437-43. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M703720200. View

2.
Rout M, Aitchison J, Magnasco M, Chait B . Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. Trends Cell Biol. 2003; 13(12):622-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2003.10.007. View

3.
Pyhtila B, Rexach M . A gradient of affinity for the karyopherin Kap95p along the yeast nuclear pore complex. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(43):42699-709. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M307135200. View

4.
Otsuka S, Iwasaka S, Yoneda Y, Takeyasu K, Yoshimura S . Individual binding pockets of importin-beta for FG-nucleoporins have different binding properties and different sensitivities to RanGTP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(42):16101-6. PMC: 2570979. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802647105. View

5.
Lim R, Koser J, Huang N, Schwarz-Herion K, Aebi U . Nanomechanical interactions of phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins studied by single molecule force-volume spectroscopy. J Struct Biol. 2007; 159(2):277-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.01.018. View