» Articles » PMID: 19669384

Survival of Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at 5 to 23 Years

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2009 Aug 12
PMID 19669384
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Recent literature suggests patients achieve substantial short-term functional improvement after combined bicompartmental implants but longer-term durability has not been documented. We therefore asked whether (1) bicompartmental arthroplasty (either combined medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and femoropatellar arthroplasty (PFA) or medial UKA/PFA, or combined medial and lateral UKA or bicompartmental UKA) reliably improved Knee Society pain and function scores; (2) bicompartmental arthroplasty was durable (survivorship, radiographic loosening, or symptomatic disease progression); (3) we could achieve durable alignment; and (4) the arthritis would progress in the unresurfaced compartment. We retrospectively reviewed 84 patients (100 knees) with bicompartmental UKA and 71 patients (77 knees) with medial UKA/PFA. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 12 years; range, 5-23 years). Bicompartmental arthroplasty reliably alleviated pain and improved function. Prosthesis survivorship at 17 years was 78% in the bicompartmental UKA group and 54% in the medial UKA/PFA group. The high revision rate, compared with total knee arthroplasty, may be related to several factors such as implant design, patient selection, crude or absent instrumentation, or component malalignment, which can all contribute to the relatively high failure rate in this series.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Current status of bicompartmental arthroplasty.

Gao Y, Yue B, Xin W Arthroplasty. 2025; 7(1):1.

PMID: 39748379 PMC: 11697474. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00283-x.


Painful Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Etiology, Diagnosis and Management.

Walsh J, Burnett R, Serino J, Gerlinger T Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024; 12(8):546-557.

PMID: 39211572 PMC: 11353146. DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.61787.3030.


Outcome of simultaneous bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Akkawi I, Draghetti M, Zmerly H Acta Biomed. 2023; 94(6):e2023240.

PMID: 38054676 PMC: 10734244. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v94i6.15006.


Image-based robot assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty.

Thilak J, Nagaraja Rao S, Mohan V, Babu B SICOT J. 2023; 8:48.

PMID: 36648272 PMC: 9879145. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2022048.


Robotic Assisted Patellofemoral Joint Replacement: Surgical Technique, Tips and Tricks.

Selvaratnam V, Toms A, Mandalia V Indian J Orthop. 2022; 56(12):2110-2118.

PMID: 36507211 PMC: 9705622. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00746-w.


References
1.
Cooke T, Scudamore R, Bryant J, Sorbie C, Siu D, Fisher B . A quantitative approach to radiography of the lower limb. Principles and applications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(5):715-20. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B5.1894656. View

2.
Fuchs S, Tibesku C, Genkinger M, Volmer M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D . Clinical and functional comparison of bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining all ligaments and constrained total knee replacement. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004; 19(3):263-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.11.004. View

3.
Engh G . A bi-compartmental solution: what the Deuce?. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(9):770-1. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20070901-01. View

4.
Rolston L, Bresch J, Engh G, Franz A, Kreuzer S, Nadaud M . Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(8 Suppl):70-3. View

5.
Dennis M, Di Cesare P . Surgical management of the middle age arthritic knee. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2004; 61(3-4):172-8. View