» Articles » PMID: 19664844

Doubts About Complex Speciation Between Humans and Chimpanzees

Overview
Date 2009 Aug 12
PMID 19664844
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two patterns from large-scale DNA sequence data have been put forward as evidence that speciation between humans and chimpanzees was complex, involving hybridization and strong selection. First, divergence between humans and chimpanzees varies considerably across the autosomes. Second, divergence between humans and chimpanzees (but not gorillas) is markedly lower on the X chromosome. Here, we describe how simple speciation and neutral molecular evolution explain both patterns. In particular, the wide range in autosomal divergence is consistent with stochastic variation in coalescence times in the ancestral population; and the lower human-chimpanzee divergence on the X chromosome is consistent with species differences in the strength of male-biased mutation caused by differences in mating system. We also highlight two further patterns of divergence that are problematic for the complex speciation model. Our conclusions raise doubts about complex speciation between humans and chimpanzees.

Citing Articles

A paternal bias in germline mutation is widespread in amniotes and can arise independently of cell division numbers.

de Manuel M, Wu F, Przeworski M Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 35916372 PMC: 9439683. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.80008.


Mitochondrial Pseudogenes Suggest Repeated Inter-Species Hybridization among Direct Human Ancestors.

Popadin K, Gunbin K, Peshkin L, Annis S, Fleischmann Z, Franco M Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(5).

PMID: 35627195 PMC: 9140377. DOI: 10.3390/genes13050810.


The population genetics of nonmigratory Allen's Hummingbird () following a recent mainland colonization.

Myers B, Burns K, Clark C, Brelsford A Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(4):1850-1865.

PMID: 33614008 PMC: 7882939. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7174.


Changes in life history and population size can explain the relative neutral diversity levels on X and autosomes in extant human populations.

Amster G, Murphy D, Milligan W, Sella G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(33):20063-20069.

PMID: 32747577 PMC: 7443924. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1915664117.


Reproductive Longevity Predicts Mutation Rates in Primates.

Thomas G, Wang R, Puri A, Harris R, Raveendran M, Hughes D Curr Biol. 2018; 28(19):3193-3197.e5.

PMID: 30270182 PMC: 6177314. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.08.050.


References
1.
Bartosch-Harlid A, Berlin S, Smith N, Moller A, Ellegren H . Life history and the male mutation bias. Evolution. 2003; 57(10):2398-406. DOI: 10.1554/03-036. View

2.
HALDANE J . The mutation rate of the gene for haemophilia, and its segregation ratios in males and females. Ann Eugen. 2010; 13(4):262-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1946.tb02367.x. View

3.
Miyata T, Hayashida H, Kuma K, Mitsuyasu K, Yasunaga T . Male-driven molecular evolution: a model and nucleotide sequence analysis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1987; 52:863-7. DOI: 10.1101/sqb.1987.052.01.094. View

4.
Turelli M, Orr H . Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics. 2000; 154(4):1663-79. PMC: 1461023. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/154.4.1663. View

5.
Masly J, Presgraves D . High-resolution genome-wide dissection of the two rules of speciation in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5(9):e243. PMC: 1971125. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050243. View