» Articles » PMID: 19661796

Preliminary Evaluation of Psychoeducational Support Interventions on Quality of Life in Rural Breast Cancer Survivors After Primary Treatment

Overview
Journal Cancer Nurs
Specialties Nursing
Oncology
Date 2009 Aug 8
PMID 19661796
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although most cancer survivors are at risk for being lost in the transition from treatment to survivorship, rural breast cancer survivors face special challenges that might place them at particular risk. This small-scale preliminary study had 2 specific aims: (aim 1) establish the feasibility of rural breast cancer survivors participation in a longitudinal quality of life (QOL) intervention trial and (aim 2) determine the effects of the Breast Cancer Education Intervention (BCEI) on overall QOL. Fifty-three rural breast cancer survivors were randomized to either an experimental (n = 27) or a wait-control arm (n = 26). Participants in the experimental arm received the BCEI consisting of 3 face-to-face education and support sessions and 2 face-to-face and 3 telephone follow-up sessions, along with supplemental written and audiotape materials over a 6-month period. Breast Cancer Education Intervention modules and interventions are organized within a QOL framework. To address the possible effects of attention, wait-control participants received 3 face-to-face sessions and 3 telephone sessions during the first 6 months of participation in the study, but not the BCEI intervention. Research questions addressing aim 1 were as follows: (a) can rural breast cancer survivors be recruited into a longitudinal intervention trial, and (b) can their participation be retained. Research questions for aim 2 were as follows: (a) do participants who received the BCEI show improvement in overall QOL, and (b) is the QOL improvement sustained over time. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures general linear mixed models. Results demonstrated the ability to recruit and retain 53 rural breast cancer survivors, that the experimental arm showed improvement in overall QOL (P = .013), and that there were significant differences in overall QOL between the experimental and wait-control groups at both months 3 and 6. Thus, it appears that at least some rural breast cancer survivors can and will participate in a larger trial and will maintain their participation and that those that do participate experience significant QOL benefit.

Citing Articles

Dissemination and implementation science frameworks and strategies to increase breast cancer screening for at-risk women in the United States: A scoping review.

Rao M, Densley S, Marciniak A, Burgoa S, Zerrouki Y, Okwaraji G J Public Health Res. 2024; 13(3):22799036241268841.

PMID: 39119619 PMC: 11304495. DOI: 10.1177/22799036241268841.


Health-related quality of life in rural cancer survivors compared with their urban counterparts: a systematic review.

Latham S, Leach M, White V, Webber K, Jefford M, Lisy K Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(7):424.

PMID: 38864894 PMC: 11168981. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08618-9.


The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review.

Brick R, Padgett L, Jones J, Wood K, Pergolotti M, Marshall T J Cancer Surviv. 2022; 17(6):1725-1750.

PMID: 35218521 PMC: 8881759. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01181-4.


Improving Survivors' Quality of Life Post-Treatment: The Perspectives of Rural Australian Cancer Survivors and Their Carers.

Gunn K, Olver I, Skrabal Ross X, Harrison N, Livingston P, Wilson C Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(7).

PMID: 33808464 PMC: 8037228. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071600.


A systematic review of behavioral interventions for rural breast cancer survivors.

Ratcliff C, Torres D, Tullos E, Geng Y, Lu Q J Behav Med. 2020; 44(4):467-483.

PMID: 32813192 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-020-00174-x.


References
1.
Collie K, Wong P, Tilston J, Butler L, Turner-Cobb J, Kreshka M . Self-efficacy, coping, and difficulties interacting with health care professionals among women living with breast cancer in rural communities. Psychooncology. 2005; 14(10):901-12. DOI: 10.1002/pon.944. View

2.
Meneses K, McNees P . Transdisciplinary integration of electronic communication technology and nursing research. Nurs Outlook. 2007; 55(5):242-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.04.004. View

3.
Curran V, CHURCH J . A study of rural women's satisfaction with a breast cancer self-help network. J Telemed Telecare. 1999; 5(1):47-54. DOI: 10.1258/1357633991932388. View

4.
Gustafson D, McTavish F, Stengle W, Ballard D, Jones E, Julesberg K . Reducing the digital divide for low-income women with breast cancer: a feasibility study of a population-based intervention. J Health Commun. 2005; 10 Suppl 1:173-93. DOI: 10.1080/10810730500263281. View

5.
Campbell N, Elliott A, Sharp L, Ritchie L, Cassidy J, Little J . Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002; 87(6):585-90. PMC: 2364239. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600515. View