» Articles » PMID: 19640659

Response Disinhibition Evoked by the Administration of Nicotine and Nicotine-associated Contextual Cues

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2009 Jul 31
PMID 19640659
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nicotine causes dose-dependent alterations in accuracy on the differential-reinforcement of low-rate responding (DRL) 29.5-s schedule in rats. The current investigation evaluated whether nicotine-associated contextual cues can produce nicotine-like perturbations in DRL-schedule performance in the absence of nicotine. Nicotine and saline administrations occurred just prior to DRL 29.5-s schedule responding for sucrose solution, and two different experimental contexts (differentiated by visual, olfactory, and tactile cues) were utilized. All subjects (N=16) experienced two consecutive sessions of DRL-schedule responding per day. The experimental group (n=8) was exposed to saline immediately prior to the first session and 0.3mg/kg nicotine before the second session, and the context was changed between sessions. This sequence of saline and then nicotine administration, paired with two reliable contexts, persisted for 12 consecutive days and successive nicotine administrations corresponded with increasingly poorer performance on the DRL 29.5-s schedule. No nicotine was administered for days 13-20 during context testing, and the nicotine-associated context produced response disinhibition on the DRL schedule. Two control groups were included in the design; subjects in one control group (n=4) received saline in each context to verify that the contexts themselves were not exerting control over operant responding. To assess how explicit and non-explicit pairings of nicotine and contextual cues influenced DRL behavior, subjects in a second control group (n=4) were given nicotine prior to the second session, but the contexts were not altered between sessions. The results from this experiment suggest that environmental stimuli associated with nicotine exposure can come to elicit nicotine-induced performance decrements on a DRL 29.5-s schedule.

Citing Articles

Revisiting the effect of nicotine on interval timing.

Daniels C, Watterson E, Garcia R, Mazur G, Brackney R, Sanabria F Behav Brain Res. 2015; 283:238-50.

PMID: 25637907 PMC: 4351175. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.027.


Detrimental effects of acute nicotine on the response-withholding performance of spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar Kyoto rats.

Mazur G, Wood-Isenberg G, Watterson E, Sanabria F Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014; 231(12):2471-82.

PMID: 24414609 PMC: 4040392. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3412-2.


Chronic stress impairs prefrontal cortex-dependent response inhibition and spatial working memory.

Mika A, Mazur G, Hoffman A, Talboom J, Bimonte-Nelson H, Sanabria F Behav Neurosci. 2012; 126(5):605-19.

PMID: 22905921 PMC: 3463780. DOI: 10.1037/a0029642.


Acute nicotine increases both impulsive choice and behavioural disinhibition in rats.

Kolokotroni K, Rodgers R, Harrison A Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011; 217(4):455-73.

PMID: 21503608 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2296-2.


Nicotine-induced impulsive action: sensitization and attenuation by mecamylamine.

Kirshenbaum A, Jackson E, Brown S, Fuchs J, Miltner B, Doughty A Behav Pharmacol. 2011; 22(3):207-21.

PMID: 21448062 PMC: 3151674. DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328345ca1c.

References
1.
Fillmore M, Rush C, Hays L . Acute effects of cocaine in two models of inhibitory control: implications of non-linear dose effects. Addiction. 2006; 101(9):1323-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01522.x. View

2.
Feola T, de Wit H, Richards J . Effects of d-amphetamine and alcohol on a measure of behavioral inhibition in rats. Behav Neurosci. 2000; 114(4):838-848. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.114.4.838. View

3.
Semenova S, Stolerman I, Markou A . Chronic nicotine administration improves attention while nicotine withdrawal induces performance deficits in the 5-choice serial reaction time task in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007; 87(3):360-8. PMC: 2691389. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.05.009. View

4.
McClure G, McMillan D . Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation. VI: differential effects under differential reinforcement of low rates of responding schedules. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997; 281(3):1368-80. View

5.
Di Pietro N, Black Y, Kantak K . Context-dependent prefrontal cortex regulation of cocaine self-administration and reinstatement behaviors in rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2006; 24(11):3285-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05193.x. View