» Articles » PMID: 19628125

Prognostic Significance of Periprocedural Versus Spontaneously Occurring Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: an Analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent...

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative impact of spontaneously occurring and periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) on survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Background: The clinical significance of periprocedural MI after PCI remains uncertain.

Methods: Outcomes during a 1-year follow-up were evaluated among 7,773 patients enrolled in the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial with a non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in whom PCI was performed.

Results: Periprocedural MI developed in 466 patients (6.0%), and spontaneous MI unrelated to PCI subsequently developed in 200 patients (2.6%). Patients developing spontaneous and periprocedural MI compared with those patients without MI had significantly greater unadjusted rates of mortality at 30 days (5.0% vs. 3.2% vs. 0.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001) and at 1 year (16.0% vs. 6.0% vs. 2.6%, respectively, p < 0.0001). In a time-updated multivariable analysis, after adjusting for differences in baseline and procedural characteristics between the groups, we found that spontaneous MI was a powerful independent predictor of subsequent mortality (hazard ratio: 7.49, 95% confidence interval: 4.95 to 11.33, p < 0.0001), whereas periprocedural MI was not a significant predictor of mortality (hazard ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval: 0.85 to 1.98, p = 0.22).

Conclusions: Among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI, the spontaneous development of an MI unrelated to PCI is a powerful predictor of subsequent mortality. In contrast, periprocedural MI is a marker of baseline risk, atherosclerosis burden, and procedural complexity but in most cases does not have independent prognostic significance. (Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes [ACS]; NCT00093158).

Citing Articles

Clinical implications of perioperative and periprocedural myocardial infarction.

Krychtiuk K, Granger C, Gersh B Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39939396 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-025-01137-y.


The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial: lessons and outcomes.

Mehran R, Vogel B Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2024; 1(11):963-964.

PMID: 39195907 DOI: 10.1038/s44161-022-00156-z.


Correlation Between Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction, Mortality, and Quality of Life in Coronary Revascularization Trials: A Meta-analysis.

Gaudino M, Di Franco A, Dimagli A, Biondi-Zoccai G, Rahouma M, Olaria R J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 2(3):100591.

PMID: 39130713 PMC: 11307952. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100591.


The Supreme Biodegradable Polymer DES in Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndromes: A PIONEER III Substudy.

Hussain Y, Saito S, Curtis M, Kereiakes D, Baumbach A, Zidar J J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 2(3):100629.

PMID: 39130696 PMC: 11307614. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100629.


Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction following Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Landi A, Montalto C, Crimi G, De Servi S Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(9):309.

PMID: 39077696 PMC: 11262399. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2309309.