» Articles » PMID: 19626384

Optimization and Validation of Radionuclide Angiography Phase Analysis Parameters for Quantification of Mechanical Dyssynchrony

Overview
Journal J Nucl Cardiol
Date 2009 Jul 24
PMID 19626384
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has the potential to improve the outcome of patients suffering from mechanical dyssynchrony and heart failure. It has been suggested that accurate quantification of baseline extent of mechanical dyssynchrony may lead to pre-selection of patients likely to respond to CRT. The standard deviation from a phase histogram (phaseSD), synchrony (S) and entropy (E) are parameters obtained from phase analysis of planar radionuclide angiography (RNA) that may provide an accurate means of assessing mechanical dyssynchrony. In this paper, the ability of phaseSD, S, and E to detect mechanical dyssynchrony was investigated and optimal values for image smoothing, histogram noise thresholding, and bin size were defined. Finally, the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the methodology was assessed.

Methods: PhaseSD, S, and E were calculated for 37 normal subjects (LVEF > 50%, end-diastolic volume < 120 mL, end-systolic volume < 60 mL, QRS < 120 ms, and normal wall motion) and 53 patients with mechanical dyssynchrony (LVEF < 30%, QRS > 120 ms, and typical LBBB). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curves were created and the area under the curve (AUC), for each parameter, was determined using three different imaging filters (no filter and an order 5 Hann filter with cut-off of 5/50 and 10/50). The AUC was also determined using histogram threshold values varying between 0% and 50% (of the max amplitude value). Finally, AUC for E was determined for bins sizes varying between 1 degrees and 20 degrees . Inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated at optimal imaging values.

Results: No smoothing was found to maximize the AUC. The AUC was independent of histogram threshold value. However, a value of 20% provided optimal visualization of the phase image. The AUC was also independent of bin size. At the optimal imaging values, the sensitivity and specificity for all parameters for detection of mechanical dyssynchrony was measured to be 89-100%. Inter- and intra-observer correlation coefficients >0.99 were found for phaseSD, S and E.

Conclusions: Optimized planar RNA phase analysis parameters, phaseSD, S, and E, were able to detect mechanical dyssynchrony with low inter- and intra-observer variability. Studies assessing the ability of these parameters to predict CRT outcome are required.

Citing Articles

Beta-blockers and mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure assessed by radionuclide ventriculography.

Jones K, Paterson C, Ray S, Motherwell D, Hamilton D, Small A J Nucl Cardiol. 2022; 30(1):193-200.

PMID: 36417121 PMC: 9984517. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-022-03142-x.


Single-photon cardiac imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices.

Valzania C, Bonfiglioli R, Fallani F, Martignani C, Ziacchi M, Diemberger I J Nucl Cardiol. 2020; 29(2):633-641.

PMID: 33241474 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02436-2.


Phase analysis of gated PET in the evaluation of mechanical ventricular synchrony: A narrative overview.

Juarez-Orozco L, Monroy-Gonzalez A, Prakken N, Noordzij W, Knuuti J, deKemp R J Nucl Cardiol. 2019; 26(6):1904-1913.

PMID: 30834496 PMC: 6908565. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01670-7.


Prognostic value of left-ventricular systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony measured from gated SPECT MPI in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Wang C, Tang H, Zhu F, Jiang Z, Shi J, Zhou Y J Nucl Cardiol. 2018; 27(5):1582-1591.

PMID: 30386981 PMC: 10959400. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-01468-z.


The role of nuclear medicine in assessments of cardiac dyssynchrony.

Naya M, Manabe O, Koyanagawa K, Tamaki N J Nucl Cardiol. 2017; 25(6):1980-1987.

PMID: 28956317 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-1072-z.


References
1.
Toussaint J, Lavergne T, Kerrou K, Froissart M, Ollitrault J, Darondel J . Basal asynchrony and resynchronization with biventricular pacing predict long-term improvement of LV function in heart failure patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003; 26(9):1815-23. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.t01-1-00275.x. View

2.
Thackray S, Coletta A, Jones P, Dunn A, Clark A, Cleland J . Clinical trials update: Highlights of the Scientific Sessions of Heart Failure 2001, a meeting of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. CONTAK-CD, CHRISTMAS, OPTIME-CHF. Eur J Heart Fail. 2001; 3(4):491-4. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-9842(01)00175-1. View

3.
OConnell J, Schreck C, Moles M, Badwar N, DeMarco T, Olgin J . A unique method by which to quantitate synchrony with equilibrium radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005; 12(4):441-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.05.006. View

4.
Botvinick E, Frais M, Shosa D, OConnell J, Scheinman M, Hattner R . An accurate means of detecting and characterizing abnormal patterns of ventricular activation by phase image analysis. Am J Cardiol. 1982; 50(2):289-98. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90179-5. View

5.
Bax J, Bleeker G, Marwick T, Molhoek S, Boersma E, Steendijk P . Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44(9):1834-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.016. View