» Articles » PMID: 19590646

Systematic Review of Cholecystostomy As a Treatment Option in Acute Cholecystitis

Overview
Journal HPB (Oxford)
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2009 Jul 11
PMID 19590646
Citations 119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an established low-mortality treatment option for elderly and critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis. The primary aim of this review is to find out if there is any evidence in the literature to recommend PC rather than cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly population.

Methods: In April 2007, a systematic electronic database search was performed on the subject of PC and cholecystectomy in the elderly population. After exclusions, 53 studies remained, comprising 1918 patients. Three papers described randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but none compared the outcomes of PC and cholecystectomy. A total of 19 papers on mortality after cholecystectomy in patients aged >65 years were identified.

Results: Successful intervention was seen in 85.6% of patients with acute cholecystitis. A total of 40% of patients treated with PC were later cholecystectomized, with a mortality rate of 1.96%. Procedure mortality was 0.36%, but 30-day mortality rates were 15.4 % in patients treated with PC and 4.5% in those treated with acute cholecystectomy (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: There are no controlled studies evaluating the outcome of PC vs. cholecystectomy and the papers reviewed are of evidence grade C. It is not possible to make definitive recommendations regarding treatment by PC or cholecystectomy in elderly or critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis. Low mortality rates after cholecystectomy in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis have been reported in recent years and therefore we believe it is time to launch an RCT to address this issue.

Citing Articles

Indications and clinical outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomies in acute cholecystitis: a study from Qatar.

Ghali M, Ali S, Gibreal K, Singh R, Shehata M, Al-Zoubi R BMC Surg. 2025; 25(1):100.

PMID: 40089720 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-025-02765-4.


Minimally Invasive Approaches for High-Risk and Elderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes.

Abdelmaseeh M, Mhmndar A, Siddiqa A, Ahamed S, Sheraz K, Mohd A Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78271.

PMID: 40026918 PMC: 11872040. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78271.


Urgent Endoscopic Biliary Procedures: "Run Like the Wind"?.

Lodato F, Landi S, Bassi M, Ghersi S, Cennamo V J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941686 PMC: 11818415. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14031017.


Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: Procedural Guidance and Future Directions for Clinical Management.

Koushesh P, Ayaz T, Tullius T Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024; 41(5):460-465.

PMID: 39664225 PMC: 11631362. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791724.


Clinical evolution of gallstones following percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with severe acute calculous cholecystitis: a single-center analysis of 102 cases.

Ragatha R, Khalil I, Jones R, Manzelli A, Reece-Smith A, Ou Y Ann Gastroenterol. 2024; 37(6):718-725.

PMID: 39568709 PMC: 11574151. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0915.


References
1.
Decker G, Goergen M, Philippart P, Mendes Da Costa P . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in geriatric patients. Acta Chir Belg. 2002; 101(6):294-9. View

2.
Byrne M, Suhocki P, Mitchell R, Pappas T, Stiffler H, Jowell P . Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: experience of 45 patients at a US referral center. J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 197(2):206-11. DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00143-1. View

3.
Chang L, Moonka R, Stelzner M . Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in veteran patients. Am J Surg. 2000; 180(3):198-202. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00476-1. View

4.
Shaver R, Hawkins Jr I, Soong J . Percutaneous cholecystostomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982; 138(6):1133-6. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.138.6.1133. View

5.
Margiotta Jr S, Willis I, Wallack M . Cholecystectomy in the elderly. Am Surg. 1988; 54(1):34-9. View