» Articles » PMID: 19589810

Pharmacodynamics of Moxifloxacin Against a High Inoculum of Escherichia Coli in an in Vitro Infection Model

Overview
Date 2009 Jul 11
PMID 19589810
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Escherichia coli is the leading bacterial species implicated in intra-abdominal infections. In these infections a high bacterial burden with pre-existing resistant mutants are likely to be encountered and resistance could be amplified with suboptimal dosing. Our objective was to investigate the pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin against a high inoculum of E. coli using an in vitro hollow fibre infection model (HFIM).

Methods: Three wild-type strains of E. coli (ATCC 25922, MG1655 and EC28044) were studied by exposing approximately 2 x 10(8) cfu/mL (20 mL) to escalating dosing regimens of moxifloxacin (ranging from 30 to 400 mg, once daily). Serial samples were obtained from HFIM over 120 h to enumerate the total and resistant subpopulation. Quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA and parC of resistant isolates were sequenced to confirm the mechanism of resistance.

Results: The pre-exposure MIC of the three wild-type strains was 0.0625 mg/L. Simulated moxifloxacin concentration profiles in HFIM were satisfactory (r(2) >or= 0.94). Placebo experiments revealed natural mutants, but no resistance amplification. Regrowth and resistance amplification was observed between 30 mg/day (AUC/MIC = 47) and 80 mg/day dose (AUC/MIC = 117). Sustained bacterial suppression was achieved at >or=120 mg/day dose (AUC/MIC = 180). Point mutations in gyrA (D87G or S83L) were detected in resistant isolates.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that suboptimal dosing may facilitate resistance amplification in a high inoculum of E. coli. The clinical dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) was adequate to suppress resistance development in three wild-type strains. Clinical relevance of these findings warrants further in vivo investigation.

Citing Articles

Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin.

Azzariti S, Mead A, Toutain P, Bond R, Pelligand L Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37887249 PMC: 10603860. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12101548.


PK/PD Analysis by Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modeling of a Marbofloxacin Dose Regimen for Treatment of Goat Mastitis Produced by Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.

Lorenzutti A, Vico J, Serrano-Rodriguez J, Himelfarb M, Andres-Larrea M, Lucas-Burneo J Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(11).

PMID: 34827830 PMC: 8614466. DOI: 10.3390/ani11113098.


Use of Supplemented or Human Material to Simulate PD Behavior of Antibiotics at the Target Site In Vitro.

Nussbaumer-Proll A, Zeitlinger M Pharmaceutics. 2020; 12(8).

PMID: 32823957 PMC: 7464672. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12080773.


Mathematical modeling of the 'inoculum effect': six applicable models and the MIC advancement point concept.

Salas J, Jaberi-Douraki M, Wen X, Volkova V FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2020; 367(5).

PMID: 31960902 PMC: 7317156. DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnaa012.


What Antibiotic Exposures Are Required to Suppress the Emergence of Resistance for Gram-Negative Bacteria? A Systematic Review.

Sumi C, Heffernan A, Lipman J, Roberts J, Sime F Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019; 58(11):1407-1443.

PMID: 31325141 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-019-00791-z.