» Articles » PMID: 19586948

Express Your Personality or Go Along with the Group: What Determines the Behaviour of Shoaling Perch?

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2009 Jul 10
PMID 19586948
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Behavioural syndromes, defined as correlated behaviours in different contexts, have been studied across species and taxa including humans as part of a personality concept. While most studies have focused on solitary individuals, less is known on how shoaling fish compromise between own personality and group behaviour. Risk-taking behaviour in 1-year-old perch (Perca fluviatilis) was observed to compare individual behaviour when in a group and when alone. An experimental design gave the fish the choice between foraging in an open area in the presence of a piscivore and hiding in the vegetation. We quantified the variation accountable by the effect of individuals being in a group, individuals alone and repeated measurements, using hierarchical mixed effects models. Within-group variances were low, but when individuals were later tested alone, individual differences explained most of the variation. Still, the individual best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) of time spent in the open area, extracted from the random effects of the mixed effects model, were positively correlated with the corresponding BLUPs when alone. The results indicate that individual behavioural traits are to some degree expressed also within groups. Most fish showed a shyer behaviour when alone, but bolder individuals changed less between treatments than did shyer ones, suggesting a more influential role of bold fish in the group.

Citing Articles

Individual phenotypic variability in the behaviour of an aggregative riverine fish is structured along a reactive-proactive axis.

Amat-Trigo F, Andreou D, Gillingham P, Britton J PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0312187.

PMID: 39565817 PMC: 11578482. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312187.


The interplay of group size and flow velocity modulates fish exploratory behaviour.

Mozzi G, Nyqvist D, Ashraf M, Comoglio C, Domenici P, Schumann S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):13186.

PMID: 38851769 PMC: 11162439. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63975-z.


Bolder together: conformity drives behavioral plasticity in eastern gartersnakes.

Skinner M, Nagabaskaran G, Gantert T, Miller N Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):2.

PMID: 38386147 PMC: 10884060. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01859-5.


Trait sensitivity to stress and cognitive bias processes in fish: A brief overview.

Buenhombre J, Daza-Cardona E, Mota-Rojas D, Dominguez-Oliva A, Rivera A, Medrano-Galarza C Personal Neurosci. 2024; 7:e3.

PMID: 38384666 PMC: 10877277. DOI: 10.1017/pen.2023.14.


The effect of heterospecific and conspecific competition on inter-individual differences in tungara frog tadpole () behavior.

Beyts C, Cella M, Colegrave N, Downie R, Martin J, Walsh P Behav Ecol. 2023; 34(2):210-222.

PMID: 36998994 PMC: 10047633. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arac109.


References
1.
Borger L, Franconi N, Ferretti F, Meschi F, De Michele G, Gantz A . An integrated approach to identify spatiotemporal and individual-level determinants of animal home range size. Am Nat. 2006; 168(4):471-85. DOI: 10.1086/507883. View

2.
Bell A . Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J Evol Biol. 2005; 18(2):464-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00817.x. View

3.
Sumpter D, Pratt S . Quorum responses and consensus decision making. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008; 364(1518):743-53. PMC: 2689713. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0204. View

4.
Reebs . Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal?. Anim Behav. 2000; 59(2):403-409. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1314. View

5.
Bunnefeld N, Baines D, Newborn D, Milner-Gulland E . Factors affecting unintentional harvesting selectivity in a monomorphic species. J Anim Ecol. 2008; 78(2):485-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01500.x. View