» Articles » PMID: 19582465

Influence of Anemia on Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Overview
Date 2009 Jul 8
PMID 19582465
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: In rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and curative resection, we evaluated the influence of anemia on tumor response to preoperative CRT.

Methods: Between August 2001 and July 2007, 490 patients underwent preoperative CRT, followed by curative-intent surgery. Tumor responses were evaluated based on tumor regression grade (TRG), T- and N-level downstaging, and volume reduction rates.

Results: The level of pretreatment hemoglobin (Hb) was 12.9 +/- 1.7 g/dl (range, 7.2-17.6 g/dl). Tumor response rates were significantly different below and above the Hb level of 9.0 g/dl. Specifically, patients with Hb levels >or=9.0 g/dl achieved better tumor responses than those with Hb levels < 9.0 g/dl (rates of TRG 3 or 4-29.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). In addition, there is no differences in tumor response between the nontransfusion and transfusion groups of patients with Hb levels >or=9.0 g/dl (rates of TRG 3 or 4-29.1% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.445).

Conclusions: The serum Hb level could be a one of prognostic factors that influences the pathologic tumor response, and pretreatment anemia (below 9.0 g/dl of Hb) is associated with poor response to preoperative CRT.

Citing Articles

The Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Anemia in Gastric Cancer Patients.

Kunishige T, Migita K, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, Nakade H, Aoki S In Vivo. 2022; 36(5):2314-2322.

PMID: 36099109 PMC: 9463922. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12962.


The measurement and modification of hypoxia in colorectal cancer: overlooked but not forgotten.

Fletcher T, Thompson A, Ashrafian H, Darzi A Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2022; 10:goac042.

PMID: 36032656 PMC: 9406947. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac042.


Vascular calcification and response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: an exploratory study.

Knight K, Drami I, McMillan D, Horgan P, Park J, Jenkins J J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021; 147(11):3409-3420.

PMID: 33710416 PMC: 8484095. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03570-1.


Anaemia and its effects on tumour regression grade and survival following chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

Boucher A, Ng O, Saunders J, Acheson A, Parsons S J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018; 9(5):797-805.

PMID: 30505578 PMC: 6219986. DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.06.05.


Effect of leukocyte alteration on treatment outcomes following preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Kim T, Park W, Choi D, Park H, Kim S, Cho Y Radiat Oncol J. 2017; 35(3):217-226.

PMID: 29037019 PMC: 5647753. DOI: 10.3857/roj.2017.00269.


References
1.
Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R . Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(17):1731-40. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694. View

2.
Chang H, Jung K, Kim D, Jeong S, Choi H, Kim Y . Bax, a predictive marker for therapeutic response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2005; 36(4):364-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.01.018. View

3.
Kim N, Baik S, Seong J, Kim H, Roh J, Lee K . Oncologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative resection with tumor-specific mesorectal excision for fixed locally advanced rectal cancer: Impact of postirradiated pathologic downstaging on local recurrence and survival. Ann Surg. 2006; 244(6):1024-30. PMC: 1856621. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225360.99257.73. View

4.
Yoon S, Kim D, Kim T, Jung K, Chang H, Koom W . Clinical parameters predicting pathologic tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 69(4):1167-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.047. View

5.
KERMAN H, Roberson S, Bloom T, Heron H, Yaeger T, Meese D . Rectal carcinoma. Long-term experience with moderately high-dose preoperative radiation and low anterior resection. Cancer. 1992; 69(11):2813-9. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920601)69:11<2813::aid-cncr2820691129>3.0.co;2-w. View