» Articles » PMID: 19582191

Hearing Aids: Quality of Life and Socio-economic Aspects

Overview
Journal Hippokratia
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2009 Jul 8
PMID 19582191
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Hearing loss can significantly impair patient's quality of life, affecting communicative behavior, emotional and social function. This study assesses the impact of hearing aids on the quality of life of patients in a rural area and its correlation with socio-economic factors.

Materials-methods: Thirty patients (18 male, 12 female), with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss of variable etiology, using hearing aid for at least five years, were enrolled in this study. Mean age of subjects was 74 years. This study used the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) to quantify the changes in quality of life. Patients were divided in above and below criterion group. The criterion used was the median of the air contraction threshold improvement. The binaural use and the type of hearing aids were recorded and correlated with the type of social security service of patients.

Results: Eighty per cent of patients reported significant benefit from the hearing aid use. The majority of patients (90%) used one hearing aid (mean GBI total score 35) and only 10% had binaural hearing aid (mean GBI total score 45). The majority of patients used analog hearing aid (56.5%) while 43.5% used digital hearing aid. Interestingly, it was found that patients did not attend appointments for hearing aids maintenance with a mean follow up of 2.5 years.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates a trend of better quality of life for patients with bilateral hearing loss and binaural hearing aid use. The type of hearing aid is related to the funding from their social security service. Therefore more patients are using analog hearing aids, as they are less expensive than the digital hearing aids.

Citing Articles

Improving Tracking of Selective Attention in Hearing Aid Users: The Role of Noise Reduction and Nonlinearity Compensation.

Wilroth J, Alickovic E, Skoglund M, Signoret C, Ronnberg J, Enqvist M eNeuro. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 39880674 PMC: 11839092. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0275-24.2025.


Prediction of pure tone thresholds using the speech reception threshold and age in elderly individuals with hearing loss.

Dindamrongkul R, Liabsuetrakul T, Pitathawatchai P BMC Res Notes. 2024; 17(1):107.

PMID: 38632663 PMC: 11025194. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-024-06762-3.


A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of motivational interviewing in new hearing aid users (MI-HAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Liu A, Wijesinghe P, Lee M, Lau C, Sun J, Nunez D Trials. 2023; 24(1):346.

PMID: 37217960 PMC: 10201034. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07352-7.


Estimating hearing aid fitting presets with machine learning-based clustering strategies.

Belitz C, Ali H, Hansen J JASA Express Lett. 2022; 1(11).

PMID: 35784455 PMC: 9245508. DOI: 10.1121/10.0007149.


Reactivation of the Neurogenic Niche in the Adult Zebrafish Statoacoustic Ganglion Following a Mechanical Lesion.

Schwarzer S, Rekhade D, Machate A, Spiess S, Geffarth M, Ezhkova D Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:850624.

PMID: 35372332 PMC: 8964994. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.850624.


References
1.
Brooks D, Bulmer D . Survey of binaural hearing aid users. Ear Hear. 1981; 2(5):220-4. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198109000-00008. View

2.
Mulrow C, Aguilar C, Endicott J, Tuley M, Velez R, Charlip W . Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1990; 113(3):188-94. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-3-188. View

3.
Arunachalam P, Kilby D, Meikle D, Davison T, Johnson I . Bone-anchored hearing aid quality of life assessed by Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Laryngoscope. 2001; 111(7):1260-3. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200107000-00022. View

4.
Cox R, Alexander G, Gray G . Who wants a hearing aid? Personality profiles of hearing aid seekers. Ear Hear. 2005; 26(1):12-26. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200502000-00002. View

5.
Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning G . Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996; 105(6):415-22. DOI: 10.1177/000348949610500601. View