» Articles » PMID: 19581906

Barrett Esophagus: Histology and Pathology for the Clinician

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2009 Jul 8
PMID 19581906
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction has increased dramatically over the past 30 years. The major precursor to this type of adenocarcinoma is Barrett esophagus, which is defined as the conversion of normal squamous epithelium into metaplastic columnar epithelium. Abundant evidence suggests that adenocarcinoma in the setting of Barrett esophagus develops via a progressive sequence of histological and molecular events. Consequently, patients with Barrett esophagus routinely undergo endoscopic surveillance for early detection of neoplasia. Histological evaluation of mucosal biopsy samples from the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction for identification of goblet cells and evaluation of the presence, grade and extent of dysplasia is the mainstay of risk assessment for these patients. This Review provides physicians with a summary of the pertinent, clinically relevant histological features of Barrett esophagus and its neoplastic complications. The histology of Barrett esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction is summarized, and an overview of information necessary to interpret pathology reports from patients either with or without endoscopic evidence of Barrett esophagus is provided to appropriately guide management of patients. Close interaction between the clinician and the pathologist is essential for proper interpretation of biopsy results and to provide optimal surveillance or treatment strategies.

Citing Articles

Predictive value of p53, Ki67 and TLR5 in neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus: a matched case-control study.

Helminen O, Melkko J, Saarnio J, Sihvo E, Kuopio T, Ohtonen P Virchows Arch. 2022; 481(3):467-476.

PMID: 35614270 PMC: 9485097. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-022-03340-5.


Role of Kruppel-Like Factor 5 in Deoxycholic Acid-Mediated Intestinal Transdifferentiation of Esophageal Squamous Epithelium.

Xia Y, Fang Y, Zhang H, Shen C, Wang P, Yan W J Cancer. 2019; 10(22):5597-5607.

PMID: 31632504 PMC: 6775683. DOI: 10.7150/jca.30050.


Endoscopic features of esophageal adenocarcinoma derived from short-segment versus long-segment Barrett's esophagus.

Yamasaki A, Shimizu T, Kawachi H, Yamamoto N, Yoshimizu S, Horiuchi Y J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 35(2):211-217.

PMID: 31396997 PMC: 7027738. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14827.


Proton Pump Inhibitors Diminish Barrett's Esophagus Length: Our Experience.

Gashi Z, Bahtiri E, Gashi A, Sherifi F Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; 6(6):1041-1045.

PMID: 29983798 PMC: 6026409. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.232.


Tenascin-C and fibronectin in normal esophageal mucosa, Barrett's esophagus, dysplasia and adenocarcinoma.

Leppanen J, Bogdanoff S, Lehenkari P, Saarnio J, Kauppila J, Karttunen T Oncotarget. 2017; 8(40):66865-66877.

PMID: 28978001 PMC: 5620141. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19196.


References
1.
Chen Y, Wang H, Antonioli D, Spechler S, Zeroogian J, Goyal R . Significance of acid-mucin-positive nongoblet columnar cells in the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Hum Pathol. 2000; 30(12):1488-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(99)90172-7. View

2.
Dorer R, Odze R . AMACR immunostaining is useful in detecting dysplastic epithelium in Barrett's esophagus, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006; 30(7):871-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213268.30468.b4. View

3.
Scheil-Bertram S, Lorenz D, Ell C, Sheremet E, Fisseler-Eckhoff A . Expression of alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase in the dysplasia carcinoma sequence associated with Barrett's esophagus. Mod Pathol. 2008; 21(8):961-7. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.73. View

4.
Haggitt R . Barrett's esophagus, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 1994; 25(10):982-93. DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(94)90057-4. View

5.
Mino-Kenudson M, Hull M, Brown I, Muzikansky A, Srivastava A, Glickman J . EMR for Barrett's esophagus-related superficial neoplasms offers better diagnostic reproducibility than mucosal biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66(4):660-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.063. View