» Articles » PMID: 19581844

Divergent Oncogenic Changes Influence Survival Differences Between Colon and Rectal Adenocarcinomas

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2009 Jul 8
PMID 19581844
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Colorectal cancers develop through various mechanisms such as chromosomal instability, DNA mismatch repair deficiency (microsatellite instability), and epigenetic DNA promoter methylation (CpG island methylator phenotype). This study evaluated the disparity in neoplastic changes between colon and rectal cancers.

Methods: A clinic-based colorectal frozen tumor bank at a single institution was queried for colon and rectal adenocarcinomas. Tumor DNA was extracted and analyzed for microsatellite instability, methylation, and mutations in the oncogenes KRAS and BRAF. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes were compared.

Results: The 268 patients with colon cancer and 89 with rectal cancer were similar in gender, tumor size, stage, and differentiation. Colon cancers had a higher incidence of microsatellite instability (27 percent) and methylator phenotype (28 percent) compared with rectal cancers (7 percent, 3 percent, respectively; P < 0.001). Although KRAS mutation rate was similar, colon cancers had a higher incidence of BRAF mutations (16.7 percent vs. 0 percent; P < 0.001). Microsatellite stable tumors had an increased risk of disease recurrence compared with microsatellite unstable tumors (odds ratio, 3.86). Despite overall differences in outcome between colon and rectal cancers, no significant difference in survival existed when similar molecular phenotypes were compared across anatomic sites.

Conclusions: Although colon cancers are molecularly heterogeneous, rectal cancers arise mostly via a single neoplastic pathway. Genetic and molecular differences influence prognosis more than anatomic location and suggest that oncogenic pathways contribute to survival differences between colon and rectal cancers.

Citing Articles

The psoas muscle density as a predictor of postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing rectal cancer resection.

Xiao Y, Wen X, Ying Y, Zhang X, Li L, Wang Z Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1189324.

PMID: 37781186 PMC: 10539580. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1189324.


Identifying and ranking causal microbial biomarkers for colorectal cancer at different cancer subsites and stages: a Mendelian randomization study.

Li H, Sheng D, Jin C, Zhao G, Zhang L Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1224705.

PMID: 37538123 PMC: 10395834. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1224705.


Meta-Analysis of the Prognostic and Predictive Role of the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer.

Wang J, Deng Z, Lang X, Jiang J, Xie K, Lu S Dis Markers. 2022; 2022:4254862.

PMID: 36157209 PMC: 9499813. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4254862.


Right colon, left colon, and rectal cancer have different oncologic and quality of life outcomes.

Duraes L, Steele S, Valente M, Lavryk O, Connelly T, Kessler H Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022; 37(4):939-948.

PMID: 35312830 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04121-x.


A Prognostic Nomogram of Colon Cancer With Liver Metastasis: A Study of the US SEER Database and a Chinese Cohort.

Liu C, Hu C, Huang J, Xiang K, Li Z, Qu J Front Oncol. 2021; 11:591009.

PMID: 33738248 PMC: 7962604. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.591009.