» Articles » PMID: 19573611

Accurate and Robust Brain Image Alignment Using Boundary-based Registration

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2009 Jul 4
PMID 19573611
Citations 1700
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The fine spatial scales of the structures in the human brain represent an enormous challenge to the successful integration of information from different images for both within- and between-subject analysis. While many algorithms to register image pairs from the same subject exist, visual inspection shows that their accuracy and robustness to be suspect, particularly when there are strong intensity gradients and/or only part of the brain is imaged. This paper introduces a new algorithm called Boundary-Based Registration, or BBR. The novelty of BBR is that it treats the two images very differently. The reference image must be of sufficient resolution and quality to extract surfaces that separate tissue types. The input image is then aligned to the reference by maximizing the intensity gradient across tissue boundaries. Several lower quality images can be aligned through their alignment with the reference. Visual inspection and fMRI results show that BBR is more accurate than correlation ratio or normalized mutual information and is considerably more robust to even strong intensity inhomogeneities. BBR also excels at aligning partial-brain images to whole-brain images, a domain in which existing registration algorithms frequently fail. Even in the limit of registering a single slice, we show the BBR results to be robust and accurate.

Citing Articles

Association of microstructural lesions of the corpus callosum with cognitive impairment in patients with high grade glioma.

Hautmann X, Weiss Lucas C, Goldbrunner R, Lohr M, Homola G, Ernestus R Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025; 167(1):74.

PMID: 40085263 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-025-06467-x.


Individual variation in the functional lateralization of human ventral temporal cortex: Local competition and long-range coupling.

Blauch N, Plaut D, Vin R, Behrmann M Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025; 3.

PMID: 40078535 PMC: 11894816. DOI: 10.1162/imag_a_00488.


An analysis of performance bottlenecks in MRI preprocessing.

Dugre M, Chatelain Y, Glatard T Gigascience. 2025; 14.

PMID: 40072903 PMC: 11899568. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giae098.


Neuroimaging changes in major depression with brief computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy compared to waitlist.

Sheline Y, Thase M, Hembree E, Balderston N, Nitchie F, Batzdorf A Mol Psychiatry. 2025; .

PMID: 40069356 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-025-02945-x.


Exploring functional connectivity in clinical and data-driven groups of preterm and term adults.

Hadaya L, Vasa F, Dimitrakopoulou K, Saqi M, Shergill S, Edwards A Brain Commun. 2025; 7(2):fcaf074.

PMID: 40066107 PMC: 11891483. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf074.


References
1.
Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P . Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997; 16(2):187-98. DOI: 10.1109/42.563664. View

2.
Sereno M, Dale A, Reppas J, Kwong K, Belliveau J, Brady T . Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science. 1995; 268(5212):889-93. DOI: 10.1126/science.7754376. View

3.
Miller K, Smith S, Jezzard P, Pauly J . High-resolution FMRI at 1.5T using balanced SSFP. Magn Reson Med. 2005; 55(1):161-70. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20753. View

4.
Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S . Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001; 20(1):45-57. DOI: 10.1109/42.906424. View

5.
Dale A, Fischl B, Sereno M . Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 1999; 9(2):179-94. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395. View