» Articles » PMID: 19571025

Cost Analysis of Multiplex PCR Testing for Diagnosing Respiratory Virus Infections

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2009 Jul 3
PMID 19571025
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We performed a cost analysis study using decision tree modeling to determine whether the use of multiplex PCR testing for respiratory viruses (xTAG RVP test) is a more or less costly strategy than the status quo testing methods used for the diagnosis of respiratory virus infections in pediatric patients. The decision tree model was constructed by using four testing strategies for respiratory virus detection, viz., direct fluorescent-antibody staining (DFA) alone, DFA plus shell vial culture (SVC), the xTAG RVP test alone, or DFA plus the xTAG RVP test. A review of the charts of 661 pediatric patients was used to determine the length of hospital stay, the number of days in isolation, antibiotic usage, and all other medical procedures performed. The cost of hospitalization by diagnostic status was determined on the basis of the average cost per patient and the number of patients in each arm of the decision tree. The cost per case was the highest for DFA plus SVC at $3,914 (in Canadian dollars), and the lowest was for the xTAG RVP test alone at $3,623, while the costs of DFA alone ($3,911) and DFA plus RVP ($3,849) were intermediate. When all four diagnostic strategies were compared, the least costly strategy was the xTAG RVP test alone when the prevalence of infection was 11% or higher and DFA alone when the prevalence was under 11%. These data indicate a savings of $291 per case investigated if the strategy of using the xTAG RVP test alone was used to replace the status quo test of DFA plus SVC, resulting in a savings of $529,620 per year in direct costs for the four Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, hospitals on the basis of the testing of specimens from 1,820 pediatric inpatients. We conclude that the use of the xTAG RVP test is the least costly strategy for the diagnosis of respiratory virus infections in children and would generate a significant savings for hospitals.

Citing Articles

PathoGD: an integrative genomics approach to primer and guide RNA design for CRISPR-based diagnostics.

Low S, ONeill M, Kerry W, Wild N, Krysiak M, Nong Y Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):147.

PMID: 39885339 PMC: 11782503. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07591-1.


A Rapid Field-Visualization Detection Platform for Genetically Modified Soybean 'Zhonghuang 6106' Based on RPA-CRISPR.

Tao R, Zhang J, Meng L, Gao J, Miao C, Liu W Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(1.

PMID: 39795964 PMC: 11719896. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010108.


Emerging Molecular Technology in Cancer Testing.

Sundaresan S, Lavanya S, Manickam M EJIFCC. 2024; 35(3):142-153.

PMID: 39507577 PMC: 11536271.


Development and Clinical Evaluation of a CRISPR/Cas12a-Based Nucleic Acid Detection Platform for the Diagnosis of Keratomycoses.

Deivarajan H, Elamurugan V, Sivashanmugam P, Pandian J, Sevugamurthi K, Rameshkumar G Ophthalmol Sci. 2024; 4(5):100522.

PMID: 38881611 PMC: 11179415. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100522.


Retrospective case study of respiratory viral panel PCR testing in primary care.

Lapin K J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(1):388-392.

PMID: 38482294 PMC: 10931873. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_446_23.


References
1.
Barenfanger J, Drake C, Leon N, Mueller T, Troutt T . Clinical and financial benefits of rapid detection of respiratory viruses: an outcomes study. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38(8):2824-8. PMC: 87120. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.38.8.2824-2828.2000. View

2.
Pabbaraju K, Tokaryk K, Wong S, Fox J . Comparison of the Luminex xTAG respiratory viral panel with in-house nucleic acid amplification tests for diagnosis of respiratory virus infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46(9):3056-62. PMC: 2546709. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00878-08. View

3.
Krunic N, Yager T, Himsworth D, Merante F, Yaghoubian S, Janeczko R . xTAG RVP assay: analytical and clinical performance. J Clin Virol. 2008; 40 Suppl 1:S39-46. PMC: 7129559. DOI: 10.1016/S1386-6532(07)70009-4. View

4.
Smit M, Beynon K, Murdoch D, Jennings L . Comparison of the NOW Influenza A & B, NOW Flu A, NOW Flu B, and Directigen Flu A+B assays, and immunofluorescence with viral culture for the detection of influenza A and B viruses. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006; 57(1):67-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.11.003. View

5.
Oosterheert J, van Loon A, Schuurman R, Hoepelman A, Hak E, Thijsen S . Impact of rapid detection of viral and atypical bacterial pathogens by real-time polymerase chain reaction for patients with lower respiratory tract infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41(10):1438-44. PMC: 7107964. DOI: 10.1086/497134. View