The Ideal Reporting Interval for an Epidemic to Objectively Interpret the Epidemiological Time Course

Overview

Journal J R Soc Interface

Specialties Biology
Biomedical Engineering
Biophysics

Date 2009 Jul 3

PMID 19570792

Citations 32

Authors

Hiroshi Nishiura

Gerardo Chowell

Hans Heesterbeek

Jacco Wallinga

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The reporting interval of infectious diseases is often determined as a time unit in the calendar regardless of the epidemiological characteristics of the disease. No guidelines have been proposed to choose the reporting interval of infectious diseases. The present study aims at translating coarsely reported epidemic data into the reproduction number and clarifying the ideal reporting interval to offer detailed insights into the time course of an epidemic. We briefly revisit the dispersibility ratio, i.e. ratio of cases in successive reporting intervals, proposed by Clare Oswald Stallybrass, detecting technical flaws in the historical studies. We derive a corrected expression for this quantity and propose simple algorithms to estimate the effective reproduction number as a function of time, adjusting the reporting interval to the generation time of a disease and demonstrating a clear relationship among the generation-time distribution, reporting interval and growth rate of an epidemic. Our exercise suggests that an ideal reporting interval is the mean generation time, so that the ratio of cases in successive intervals can yield the reproduction number. When it is impractical to report observations every mean generation time, we also present an alternative method that enables us to obtain straightforward estimates of the reproduction number for any reporting interval that suits the practical purpose of infection control.

Citing Articles

Hotspot analysis of COVID-19 infection in Tokyo based on influx patterns.

Kimura Y, Seki T, Chujo K, Murata T, Sakurai T, Miyata S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1081.

PMID: 39774000 PMC: 11707207. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82962-y.

Epidemiological impact of revoking mask-wearing recommendation on COVID-19 transmission in Tokyo, Japan.

Nagata M, Okada Y, Nishiura H Infect Dis Model. 2024; 9(4):1289-1300.

PMID: 39252817 PMC: 11382031. DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.08.002.

Angular reproduction numbers improve estimates of transmissibility when disease generation times are misspecified or time-varying.

Parag K, Cowling B, Lambert B Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2007):20231664.

PMID: 37752839 PMC: 10523088. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1664.

An investigation of spatial-temporal patterns and predictions of the coronavirus 2019 pandemic in Colombia, 2020-2021.

Tariq A, Chakhaia T, Dahal S, Ewing A, Hua X, Ofori S PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022; 16(3):e0010228.

PMID: 35245285 PMC: 8926206. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010228.

Simulating the impacts of interregional mobility restriction on the spatial spread of COVID-19 in Japan.

Kondo K Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):18951.

PMID: 34556681 PMC: 8460743. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97170-1.

References

Roberts M, Heesterbeek J . Model-consistent estimation of the basic reproduction number from the incidence of an emerging infection. J Math Biol. 2007; 55(5-6):803-16. PMC: 2782110. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-007-0112-8. View

Ferguson N, Donnelly C, Anderson R . Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain. Nature. 2001; 413(6855):542-8. DOI: 10.1038/35097116. View

Wallinga J, Teunis P . Different epidemic curves for severe acute respiratory syndrome reveal similar impacts of control measures. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160(6):509-16. PMC: 7110200. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh255. View

Fraser C . Estimating individual and household reproduction numbers in an emerging epidemic. PLoS One. 2007; 2(8):e758. PMC: 1950082. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000758. View

Cauchemez S, Boelle P, Donnelly C, Ferguson N, Thomas G, Leung G . Real-time estimates in early detection of SARS. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006; 12(1):110-3. PMC: 3293464. DOI: 10.3201/eid1201.050593. View

White L, Pagano M . Transmissibility of the influenza virus in the 1918 pandemic. PLoS One. 2008; 3(1):e1498. PMC: 2204055. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001498. View

Gran J, Wasmuth L, Amundsen E, Lindqvist B, Aalen O . Growth rates in epidemic models: application to a model for HIV/AIDS progression. Stat Med. 2008; 27(23):4817-34. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3219. View

Nishiura H, Dietz K, Eichner M . The earliest notes on the reproduction number in relation to herd immunity: Theophil Lotz and smallpox vaccination. J Theor Biol. 2006; 241(4):964-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.01.012. View

Ferguson N, Cummings D, Cauchemez S, Fraser C, Riley S, Meeyai A . Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia. Nature. 2005; 437(7056):209-14. DOI: 10.1038/nature04017. View

10.

Chowell G, Nishiura H, Bettencourt L . Comparative estimation of the reproduction number for pandemic influenza from daily case notification data. J R Soc Interface. 2007; 4(12):155-66. PMC: 2358966. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0161. View

11.

Nishiura H, Eichner M . Infectiousness of smallpox relative to disease age: estimates based on transmission network and incubation period. Epidemiol Infect. 2006; 135(7):1145-50. PMC: 2870668. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268806007618. View

12.

Cauchemez S, Boelle P, Thomas G, Valleron A . Estimating in real time the efficacy of measures to control emerging communicable diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 164(6):591-7. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj274. View

13.

Wallinga J, Lipsitch M . How generation intervals shape the relationship between growth rates and reproductive numbers. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1609):599-604. PMC: 1766383. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3754. View

14.

Haydon D, Chase-Topping M, Shaw D, Matthews L, Friar J, Wilesmith J . The construction and analysis of epidemic trees with reference to the 2001 UK foot-and-mouth outbreak. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1511):121-7. PMC: 1691228. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2191. View

15.

Cauchemez S, Ferguson N . Likelihood-based estimation of continuous-time epidemic models from time-series data: application to measles transmission in London. J R Soc Interface. 2008; 5(25):885-97. PMC: 2607466. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1292. View

16.

Garske T, Clarke P, Ghani A . The transmissibility of highly pathogenic avian influenza in commercial poultry in industrialised countries. PLoS One. 2007; 2(4):e349. PMC: 1831494. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000349. View

17.

Honhold N, Taylor N, Mansley L, Paterson A . Relationship of speed of slaughter on infected premises and intensity of culling of other premises to the rate of spread of the foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain, 2001. Vet Rec. 2004; 155(10):287-94. DOI: 10.1136/vr.155.10.287. View

18.

White L, Pagano M . A likelihood-based method for real-time estimation of the serial interval and reproductive number of an epidemic. Stat Med. 2007; 27(16):2999-3016. PMC: 3951165. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3136. View

19.

Svensson A . A note on generation times in epidemic models. Math Biosci. 2006; 208(1):300-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.10.010. View

20.

Carrat F, Vergu E, Ferguson N, Lemaitre M, Cauchemez S, Leach S . Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: a review of volunteer challenge studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167(7):775-85. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm375. View