» Articles » PMID: 19570118

Drug Titration Patterns and HbA 1c Levels in Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2009 Jul 3
PMID 19570118
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate oral antidiabetes drug (OAD) use, haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) testing and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients.

Study Design: Retrospective analysis based on claims data from the Integrated Healthcare Information Services (IHCIS) National Managed Care Benchmark Database.

Methods: OAD use and HbA(1c) testing were analysed for patients with >or= 2 claims indicating diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and >or= 1 90-day OAD treatment period between 1 January, 2000 and 30 June, 2006. Likelihood of HbA(1c) testing was examined using multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusting for OAD regimen and patients' sociodemographical characteristics.

Results: Patients were classified based on initial OAD regimen: metformin (MET) (n = 22,203; 41.3%), sulphonylurea (SFU) (n = 18,439; 34.3%), thiazolidinedione (TZD) (n = 7663; 14.3%), SFU + MET (n = 5467; 10.2%) and TZD + MET (n = 2355; 4.2%). A total of 51.5% of patients had HbA(1c) testing during 90 days preceding OAD initiation through regimen completion. Approximately, 65% of MET and 58% of SFU patients had no titration of initial regimen. Patients demonstrating inadequate glucose control decreased from 68.5% at baseline to 46.9% within 90 days of regimen initiation. Multivariable logistic regression indicated several negative predictors of HbA(1c) testing, including SFU use, age 65+ years, moderate insurance copayment and preindex inpatient utilisation. Multivariable logistic regression of variables associated with reduced likelihood of up-titration included TZD, SFU + MET, or TZD + MET treatment, age 18-34 years, Medicare insurance and any preindex healthcare utilisation.

Conclusions: Patients are not being transitioned to additional OADs in a stepwise fashion and/or are receiving inadequate titration on current OAD regimens. The low rate of HbA(1c) testing and rates of control are contributing factors.

Citing Articles

Dual Therapy Appears Superior to Monotherapy for Low-Income Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes.

Vaughan E, Johnston C, Hyman D, Hernandez D, Hemmige V, Foreyt J J Prim Care Community Health. 2017; 8(4):305-311.

PMID: 29216790 PMC: 5748290. DOI: 10.1177/2150131917745760.


Diabetes treatment intensification and associated changes in HbA1c and body mass index: a cohort study.

Roumie C, Greevy R, Grijalva C, Hung A, Liu X, Griffin M BMC Endocr Disord. 2016; 16(1):32.

PMID: 27255309 PMC: 4890276. DOI: 10.1186/s12902-016-0101-2.

References
1.
. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(1):213-29. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.1.213. View

2.
Nau D . Evaluating medication use for continuous quality improvement in diabetes care. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003; 8(5):378-82. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2002.8.5.378. View

3.
Coberley C, McGinnis M, Orr P, Coberley S, Hobgood A, Hamar B . Association between frequency of telephonic contact and clinical testing for a large, geographically diverse diabetes disease management population. Dis Manag. 2007; 10(2):101-9. DOI: 10.1089/dis.2006.632. View

4.
Saydah S, Fradkin J, Cowie C . Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA. 2004; 291(3):335-42. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.3.335. View

5.
Parchman M, Pugh J, Romero R, Bowers K . Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. Ann Fam Med. 2007; 5(3):196-201. PMC: 1886492. DOI: 10.1370/afm.679. View