» Articles » PMID: 19567715

Opioid Metabolism

Overview
Journal Mayo Clin Proc
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2009 Jul 2
PMID 19567715
Citations 206
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinicians understand that individual patients differ in their response to specific opioid analgesics and that patients may require trials of several opioids before finding an agent that provides effective analgesia with acceptable tolerability. Reasons for this variability include factors that are not clearly understood, such as allelic variants that dictate the complement of opioid receptors and subtle differences in the receptor-binding profiles of opioids. However, altered opioid metabolism may also influence response in terms of efficacy and tolerability, and several factors contributing to this metabolic variability have been identified. For example, the risk of drug interactions with an opioid is determined largely by which enzyme systems metabolize the opioid. The rate and pathways of opioid metabolism may also be influenced by genetic factors, race, and medical conditions (most notably liver or kidney disease). This review describes the basics of opioid metabolism as well as the factors influencing it and provides recommendations for addressing metabolic issues that may compromise effective pain management. Articles cited in this review were identified via a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed. Articles selected for inclusion discussed general physiologic aspects of opioid metabolism, metabolic characteristics of specific opioids, patient-specific factors influencing drug metabolism, drug interactions, and adverse events.

Citing Articles

Risk of hospital inpatient opioid overdose (RHINOO): a review of factors impacting naloxone administration in patients receiving opioids.

Alban H, Ireifej N, DAlessandro J, Jordan G, Lee R, Patricia N Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025; .

PMID: 39849175 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-025-03801-1.


Lower Diversity of Amylase-Trypsin Inhibitors and -Released Opioid-Containing Peptides in Ancestral Compared to Modern Wheat Varieties Assessed by Proteomics and Peptidomics.

Asledottir T, Mamone G, Picariello G, Vegarud G, Roseth A, Ferranti P J Agric Food Chem. 2025; 73(4):2373-2380.

PMID: 39813239 PMC: 11783586. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c05959.


Catalyzing Pharmacogenomic Analysis for Informing Pain Treatment (C-PAIN): A Randomized Trial of Preemptive Genotyping in Cancer Palliative Care.

Cho Y, Karrison T, Jack M, Choksi A, Knoebel R, Yeo K J Pain Res. 2024; 17:4187-4196.

PMID: 39717756 PMC: 11664000. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S488416.


Could chronic opioid use be an additional risk of hepatic damage in patients with previous liver diseases, and what is the role of microbiome?.

Tarantino G, Cataldi M, Citro V Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1319897.

PMID: 39687876 PMC: 11646994. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1319897.


Opioid use and poisoning in hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease.

Zaidan N, Jalloul Y, Goldfarb D, Azar H, El-Sayegh S J Nephrol. 2024; .

PMID: 39616593 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-024-02159-4.


References
1.
Totah R, Allen K, Sheffels P, Whittington D, Kharasch E . Enantiomeric metabolic interactions and stereoselective human methadone metabolism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007; 321(1):389-99. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.117580. View

2.
Gasche Y, Daali Y, Fathi M, Chiappe A, Cottini S, Dayer P . Codeine intoxication associated with ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolism. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(27):2827-31. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041888. View

3.
Aklillu E, Persson I, Bertilsson L, Johansson I, Rodrigues F, Ingelman-Sundberg M . Frequent distribution of ultrarapid metabolizers of debrisoquine in an ethiopian population carrying duplicated and multiduplicated functional CYP2D6 alleles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996; 278(1):441-6. View

4.
Halling J, Weihe P, Brosen K . CYP2D6 polymorphism in relation to tramadol metabolism: a study of faroese patients. Ther Drug Monit. 2008; 30(3):271-5. DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181666b2f. View

5.
Inturrisi C . Pharmacology of methadone and its isomers. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005; 71(7-8):435-7. View