» Articles » PMID: 19567341

In Vivo IVUS-based 3-D Fluid-structure Interaction Models with Cyclic Bending and Anisotropic Vessel Properties for Human Atherosclerotic Coronary Plaque Mechanical Analysis

Overview
Date 2009 Jul 2
PMID 19567341
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this paper, a modeling approach combining in vivo intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging, computational modeling, angiography, and mechanical testing is proposed to perform mechanical analysis for human coronary atherosclerotic plaques for potential more accurate plaque vulnerability assessment. A 44-slice in vivo IVUS dataset of a coronary plaque was acquired from one patient, and four 3-D models with fluid-structure interactions (FSIs) based on the data were constructed to quantify effects of anisotropic vessel properties and cyclic bending of the coronary plaque on flow and plaque stress/strain conditions. Compared to the isotropic model (model 1, no bending, no axial stretch), maximum stress- P(1) (maximum principal stress) values on the cut surface with maximum bending (where applicable) from model 2 (anisotropic, no bending, no stretch), model 3 (anisotropic, with bending, no stretch), and model 4 (anisotropic with bending and stretch) were, respectively, 63%, 126%, and 345% higher than that from model 1. Effects of cyclic bending on flow behaviors were modest (5%-15%). Our preliminary results indicated that in vivo IVUS-based FSI models with cyclic bending and anisotropic material properties could improve the accuracies of plaque stress/strain predictions and plaque vulnerability assessment. Large-scale patient studies are needed to further validate our findings.

Citing Articles

Tiny Organs, Big Impact: How Microfluidic Organ-on-Chip Technology Is Revolutionizing Mucosal Tissues and Vasculature.

Dasgupta I, Rangineni D, Abdelsaid H, Ma Y, Bhushan A Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790343 PMC: 11117503. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050476.


Impact of residual stress on coronary plaque stress/strain calculations using optical coherence tomography image-based multi-layer models.

Huang M, Maehara A, Tang D, Zhu J, Wang L, Lv R Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1395257.

PMID: 38725836 PMC: 11079268. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1395257.


Patient-Specific Numerical Simulations of Coronary Artery Hemodynamics and Biomechanics: A Pathway to Clinical Use.

Fandaros M, Kwok C, Wolf Z, Labropoulos N, Yin W Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2024; 15(5):503-521.

PMID: 38710896 DOI: 10.1007/s13239-024-00731-4.


Integrating Computational and Biological Hemodynamic Approaches to Improve Modeling of Atherosclerotic Arteries.

Vuong T, Bartolf-Kopp M, Andelovic K, Jungst T, Farbehi N, Wise S Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(26):e2307627.

PMID: 38704690 PMC: 11234431. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202307627.


Validation of biomechanical assessment of coronary plaque vulnerability based on intravascular optical coherence tomography and digital subtraction angiography.

Zhang X, Nan N, Tong X, Chen H, Zhang X, Li S Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(2):1477-1492.

PMID: 38415169 PMC: 10895097. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1094.


References
1.
Kimura B, Bhargava V, DeMaria A . Value and limitations of intravascular ultrasound imaging in characterizing coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Am Heart J. 1995; 130(2):386-96. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90457-3. View

2.
Holzapfel G, Sommer G, Regitnig P . Anisotropic mechanical properties of tissue components in human atherosclerotic plaques. J Biomech Eng. 2005; 126(5):657-65. DOI: 10.1115/1.1800557. View

3.
Liang Y, Zhu H, Friedman M . Estimation of the transverse strain tensor in the arterial wall using IVUS image registration. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008; 34(11):1832-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.04.005. View

4.
Lee R, Kamm R . Vascular mechanics for the cardiologist. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23(6):1289-95. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90369-7. View

5.
Long Q, Xu X, Ariff B, Thom S, Hughes A, Stanton A . Reconstruction of blood flow patterns in a human carotid bifurcation: a combined CFD and MRI study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11(3):299-311. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(200003)11:3<299::aid-jmri9>3.0.co;2-m. View