» Articles » PMID: 19563270

Drug Delivery to the Lymphatic System: Importance in Future Cancer Diagnosis and Therapies

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2009 Jul 1
PMID 19563270
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the US. Currently, protocols for cancer treatment include surgery to remove diseased and suspect tissues, focused radiation, systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy and their combinations. With conventional chemotherapy, it is almost impossible to deliver anticancer drugs specifically to the tumor cells without damaging healthy organs or tissues. Over the past several decades, efforts have been made to improve drug delivery technologies that target anticancer drugs specifically to tumor cells. It has been known for over four decades that the lymphatics are the first site of metastasis for most solid cancers; however, few efforts have been made to localize chemotherapies to lymphatic tissues. Trials of several systemic targeted drug delivery systems based on nanoparticles containing chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., liposomal doxorubicin) have shown similar antitumor activity but better patient tolerance compared with conventional formulations. Animal studies have demonstrated that nanoparticles made of natural or synthetic polymers and liposomal carriers have higher accumulation in the lymph nodes and surrounding lymphatics compared to conventional intravenous therapies. This combination has the potential to both reduce nonspecific organ toxicities and increase the chemotherapeutic dose to the most likely sites of locoregional cancer metastasis.

Citing Articles

Decreased lymph node estrogen levels cause nonremitting progressive experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis disease.

Anwar S, Lin P, Pacheco L, Imai K, Tan Z, Song Z PNAS Nexus. 2025; 4(1):pgaf010.

PMID: 39871825 PMC: 11770340. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf010.


Nano-fluorescence imaging: advancing lymphatic disease diagnosis and monitoring.

Han C, Choi S, Chi S, Hong J, Cho Y, Kim J Nano Converg. 2024; 11(1):53.

PMID: 39661218 PMC: 11635084. DOI: 10.1186/s40580-024-00462-1.


Therapeutic ultrasound: an innovative approach for targeting neurological disorders affecting the basal ganglia.

Singh A, Reynolds J Front Neuroanat. 2024; 18:1469250.

PMID: 39417047 PMC: 11480080. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2024.1469250.


Predicting lung exposure of intramuscular niclosamide as an antiviral agent: Power-law based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Kim T, Jung W, Cho S, Kim G, Yun H, Chae J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 17(5):e13833.

PMID: 38797873 PMC: 11128490. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13833.


Recent advances in zwitterionic nanoscale drug delivery systems to overcome biological barriers.

Ouyang X, Liu Y, Zheng K, Pang Z, Peng S Asian J Pharm Sci. 2024; 19(1):100883.

PMID: 38357524 PMC: 10861844. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2023.100883.


References
1.
Liu J, Wong H, Moselhy J, Bowen B, Wu X, Johnston M . Targeting colloidal particulates to thoracic lymph nodes. Lung Cancer. 2006; 51(3):377-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.11.006. View

2.
Parker R, Priester E, Sieber S . Effect of route administration and liposome entrapment on the metabolism and disposition of adriamycin in the rat. Drug Metab Dispos. 1982; 10(5):499-504. View

3.
McElroy M, Hayashi K, Garmy-Susini B, Kaushal S, Varner J, Moossa A . Fluorescent LYVE-1 antibody to image dynamically lymphatic trafficking of cancer cells in vivo. J Surg Res. 2008; 151(1):68-73. PMC: 2628480. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.12.769. View

4.
Parker R, Hartman K, Sieber S . Lymphatic absorption and tissue disposition of liposome-entrapped [14C]adriamycin following intraperitoneal administration to rats. Cancer Res. 1981; 41(4):1311-7. View

5.
Kobayashi H, Kawamoto S, Sakai Y, Choyke P, Star R, Brechbiel M . Lymphatic drainage imaging of breast cancer in mice by micro-magnetic resonance lymphangiography using a nano-size paramagnetic contrast agent. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96(9):703-8. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh124. View