» Articles » PMID: 19562070

Blastocyst Stage Transfer Vs Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfer

Overview
Date 2009 Jun 30
PMID 19562070
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of blastocyst transfer in comparison with cleavage stage embryo in a similar cohort of women.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: University teaching hospital.

Materials And Methods: Women aged 35 or less undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection between January 2005 and December 2006 were included in the study. When four or more grade 1 embryos were observed on day 3, extended culture till day 5 was undertaken. This policy was compared with a cohort of women who had at least three grade 1 embryos on day 3 and who had undergone a cleavage stage embryo transfer during the time period of January 2002-December 2004. Primary outcome evaluated was implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate.

Results: Group 1 consisted of 50 women who underwent extended culture and blastocyst transfer. Group 2 comprised of 85 women who had cleavage transfer. The implantation rate for embryos transferred in group 1 was significantly higher than that for embryos transferred on day 3 (40.16% vs 11.43%). The clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly better with blastocyst transfer as compared with cleavage stage transfer (62% vs 29.76%). Significantly fewer embryos were required for transfer at the blastocyst stage compared with day 3 transfer (2.54 vs 3.45).

Conclusion: In selected cases, blastocyst transfer with fewer embryos can be performed with high implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. This policy could lead to a reduction in the incidence of higher-order pregnancies.

Citing Articles

Comparing the pregnancy outcomes of cleavage and blastocyst stage in frozen embryo transfer cycles: A cross-sectional study.

Parsafar Z, Dehghani-Firouzabadi R Int J Reprod Biomed. 2024; 21(11):929-936.

PMID: 38292510 PMC: 10823116. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i11.14656.


Body mass index impacts ectopic pregnancy during in vitro fertilization: an analysis of 42,362 clinical pregnancy cycles.

Ge X, Wang K, Sun Y, Bu Z Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023; 21(1):105.

PMID: 37907931 PMC: 10617086. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01146-x.


Risk Factors of Recurrent Ectopic Pregnancy in Patients Treated With Fertilization Cycles: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Tan Y, Bu Z, Shi H, Song H, Zhang Y Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020; 11:552117.

PMID: 33071969 PMC: 7531597. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.552117.


Successful Pregnancy following Mixed Double Embryo Transfer in a Patient with Variable Window of Implantation.

Stamenov G, Parvanov D, Chaushev T Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 2018:1687583.

PMID: 29854507 PMC: 5960520. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1687583.


The influence of body mass index on pregnancy outcome following single-embryo transfer.

Ben-Haroush A, Sirota I, Salman L, Son W, Tulandi T, Holzer H J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35(7):1295-1300.

PMID: 29808381 PMC: 6063822. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1186-5.


References
1.
Olivennes F, Hazout A, Lelaidier C, Freitas S, Fanchin R, De Ziegler D . Four indications for embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 1994; 9(12):2367-73. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138454. View

2.
Blake D, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Proctor M . Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (4):CD002118. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub3. View

3.
Lopata A . The neglected human blastocyst. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992; 9(6):508-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF01204246. View

4.
Vidaeff A, Racowsky C, Rayburn W . Blastocyst transfer in human in vitro fertilization. A solution to the multiple pregnancy epidemic. J Reprod Med. 2000; 45(7):529-39; discussion 539-40. View

5.
Gardner D, Surrey E, Minjarez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft W . Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81(3):551-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.023. View