» Articles » PMID: 19562058

Declining Semen Quality Among South Indian Infertile Men: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Date 2009 Jun 30
PMID 19562058
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Male reproductive function has recently attracted increasing attention due to reports on time-related decline in semen quality. Furthermore, regional differences in the semen quality have also been reported.

Aim: To investigate the semen quality among large cohort of infertile individuals at a regional level, in terms of the sperm concentration, total sperm motility, sperm morphology and incidence of azoospermia over a period of 13 years.

Setting: University infertility clinic at Kasturba Hospital, Manipal which is a tertiary healthcare centre serving the general population.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Materials And Methods: This includes a total of 7770 subjects who presented for semen analysis from 1993 to 2005. The data regarding ejaculate volume, sperm density, motility, morphology and the incidence of azoospermia were collected.

Statistical Analysis Used: One way analysis of variance (ANOVA), regression analysis and Chi square analysis.

Results: The average sperm density among infertile men during 2004-2005 was 26.61 +/- 0.71 millions/mL which was significantly lower than the average sperm density observed in 1993-1994 (38.18 +/- 1.46 millions/mL). Similar trend was also observed for sperm motility (47.14% motile sperms vs. 61.16%) and normal sperm morphology (19.75% vs. 40.51%). Interestingly, the incidence of severe oligospermia (mean sperm density <10 millions/mL) observed in 2002-2005 and 1993-1997 demonstrated a significant inverse relationship (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our study provides the first evidence that the quality of human semen evaluated for infertility is deteriorating in the southern part of the India over the years, probably due to environmental, nutritional, life style or socioeconomic causes.

Citing Articles

The Association of Sperm DNA Fragmentation With Serum Lipid Profile Among Males With Abnormal Semen Parameters: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.

Thankamoni R, Tamgire D, Dasari P, Adole P, Jinkala S, Ns K Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60243.

PMID: 38872655 PMC: 11169997. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60243.


Global, regional and national burden of male infertility in 204 countries and territories between 1990 and 2019: an analysis of global burden of disease study.

Huang B, Wang Z, Kong Y, Jin M, Ma L BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):2195.

PMID: 37940907 PMC: 10631182. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16793-3.


Trends in semen parameters of infertile men in South Africa and Nigeria.

Akang E, Opuwari C, Enyioma-Alozie S, Moungala L, Amatu T, Wada I Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):6819.

PMID: 37100822 PMC: 10133443. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33648-4.


Clinical Presentations and Semen Characteristics of Men Attending the Secondary Referral Infertility Clinic at Mumbai, India.

Khan S, Kulkarni V, Shah R, Gokral J, Meherji P, Vadigoppula A J Hum Reprod Sci. 2022; 14(4):356-364.

PMID: 35197680 PMC: 8812386. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_93_21.


Structure-based redesigning of pentoxifylline analogs against selective phosphodiesterases to modulate sperm functional competence for assisted reproductive technologies.

Satish M, Kumari S, Deeksha W, Abhishek S, Nitin K, Adiga S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):12293.

PMID: 34112881 PMC: 8192908. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91636-y.


References
1.
Jorgensen N, Andersen A, Eustache F, Irvine D, Suominen J, Petersen J . Regional differences in semen quality in Europe. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(5):1012-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.1012. View

2.
Iwamoto T, Nozawa S, Yoshiike M, Hoshino T, Baba K, Matsushita T . Semen quality of 324 fertile Japanese men. Hum Reprod. 2005; 21(3):760-5. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei362. View

3.
Bussen S, Sutterlin M, Steck T, Dietl J . Semen parameters in patients with unilateral testicular cancer compared to patients with other malignancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003; 269(3):196-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-003-0493-x. View

4.
Gao J, Gao E, Yang Q, Walker M, Wu J, Zhou W . Semen quality in a residential, geographic and age representative sample of healthy Chinese men. Hum Reprod. 2006; 22(2):477-84. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del383. View

5.
FISCH H, Goluboff E . Geographic variations in sperm counts: a potential cause of bias in studies of semen quality. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65(5):1044-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58284-3. View