» Articles » PMID: 19560270

Sex Differences in Functional Brain Activation During Noxious Visceral Stimulation in Rats

Overview
Journal Pain
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2009 Jun 30
PMID 19560270
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies in healthy human subjects and patients with irritable bowel syndrome suggest sex differences in cerebral nociceptive processing. Here we examine sex differences in functional brain activation in the rat during colorectal distention (CRD), a preclinical model of acute visceral pain. [(14)C]-iodoantipyrine was injected intravenously in awake, non-restrained female rats during 60- or 0-mmHg CRD while electromyographic abdominal activity (EMG) and pain behavior were recorded. Regional cerebral blood flow-related tissue radioactivity was analyzed by statistical parametric mapping from autoradiographic images of three-dimensionally reconstructed brains. Sex differences were addressed by comparing the current data with our previously published data collected from male rats. While sex differences in EMG and pain scores were modest, significant differences were noted in functional brain activation. Females showed widespread changes in limbic (amygdala, hypothalamus) and paralimbic structures (ventral striatum, nucleus accumbens, raphe), while males demonstrated broad cortical changes. Sex differences were apparent in the homeostatic afferent network (parabrachial nucleus, thalamus, insular and dorsal anterior cingulate cortices), in an emotional-arousal network (amygdala, locus coeruleus complex), and in cortical areas modulating these networks (prefrontal cortex). Greater activation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and broader limbic/paralimbic changes in females suggest greater engagement of affective mechanisms during visceral pain. Greater cortical activation in males is consistent with the concept of greater cortical inhibitory effects on limbic structures in males, which may relate to differences in attentional and cognitive attribution to visceral stimuli. These findings show remarkable similarities to reported sex differences in brain responses to visceral stimuli in humans.

Citing Articles

FAAH inhibitor URB597 shows anti-hyperalgesic action and increases brain and intestinal tissues fatty acid amides in a model of CRF agonist mediated visceral hypersensitivity in male rats.

Larauche M, Mulak A, Ha C, Million M, Arnett S, Germano P Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024; 36(12):e14927.

PMID: 39344695 PMC: 11781189. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14927.


Generation of a whole-brain hemodynamic response function and sex-specific differences in cerebral processing of mechano-sensation in mice detected by BOLD fMRI.

Chen H, Lambers H, Nagelmann N, Sandbrink M, Segelcke D, Pogatzki-Zahn E Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1187328.

PMID: 37700753 PMC: 10493293. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1187328.


Olfactory Stimulation Successfully Modulates the Neurochemical, Biochemical and Behavioral Phenotypes of the Visceral Pain.

Liao W, Yao R, Chen L, Renn T, Klimenkov I, Sudakov N Molecules. 2022; 27(21).

PMID: 36364487 PMC: 9655738. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27217659.


Aberrant resting-state functional connectivity and topological properties of the subcortical network in functional dyspepsia patients.

Zhang P, He Z, Mao Y, Sun R, Qu Y, Chen L Front Mol Neurosci. 2022; 15:1001557.

PMID: 36311019 PMC: 9606653. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.1001557.


Sex differences in pain along the neuraxis.

Presto P, Mazzitelli M, Junell R, Griffin Z, Neugebauer V Neuropharmacology. 2022; 210:109030.

PMID: 35331712 PMC: 9354808. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109030.


References
1.
Murphy A, Suckow S, Johns M, Traub R . Sex differences in the activation of the spinoparabrachial circuit by visceral pain. Physiol Behav. 2009; 97(2):205-12. PMC: 2788429. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.037. View

2.
Oppenheimer S, Gelb A, Girvin J, Hachinski V . Cardiovascular effects of human insular cortex stimulation. Neurology. 1992; 42(9):1727-32. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.42.9.1727. View

3.
Phillips M, Drevets W, Rauch S, Lane R . Neurobiology of emotion perception I: The neural basis of normal emotion perception. Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 54(5):504-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00168-9. View

4.
Tomasi D, Chang L, Caparelli E, Ernst T . Sex differences in sensory gating of the thalamus during auditory interference of visual attention tasks. Neuroscience. 2008; 151(4):1006-15. PMC: 2262922. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.08.040. View

5.
Thevenaz P, Ruttimann U, Unser M . A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2008; 7(1):27-41. DOI: 10.1109/83.650848. View