Vectorcardiographic Determinants of Cardiac Memory During Normal Ventricular Activation and Continuous Ventricular Pacing
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Cardiac memory (CM) refers to persistent T-wave changes on resumption of normal conduction after a period of abnormal ventricular activation. Traditionally, to observe CM, normal ventricular activation had to be restored, limiting the exploration of this phenomenon in clinical practice.
Objective: This study sought to prove that CM can be detected during continuous aberrant activation and to establish factors affecting its magnitude using a vectorcardiographic technique.
Methods: Sixteen nonpacemaker-dependent patients (11 male, age 72 +/- 8 years, mean +/- SD) undergoing pacemaker/internal cardioverter-defibrillator implantation were paced in DDD mode with a short atrioventricular (AV) delay for 7 days to induce CM. Electrocardiograms were acquired during AAI and DDD pacing at a constant rate before and after CM induction. Dower transform-derived vectorcardiograms were reconstructed and analyzed.
Results: T vector during AAI pacing changed in both magnitude (baseline, 0.26 +/- 0.10 mV; Day 7, 0.39 +/- 0.13 mV, P < .01) and direction aligning with the paced QRS vector (baseline DDD QRS - AAI T angle 125 degrees +/- 36 degrees; Day 7, 39 degrees +/- 21 degrees, P < .01). During DDD pacing, there was no change in T-vector direction, but T amplitude decreased (baseline, 1.06 +/- 0.32 mV; Day 7, 0.71 +/- 0.26 mV, P < .01). CM measured as T-vector peak displacement (TPD) was identical in AAI and DDD mode (TPD 0.46 +/- .0.17 mV and 0.46 +/- 0.17 mV, respectively). Individual CM magnitude correlated with QRS/T-vector amplitude ratio during DDD pacing at baseline (r = 0.90).
Conclusion: CM can be reliably shown during continuous ventricular pacing, expanding its application to situations in which abnormal ventricular activation persists. Its magnitude is determined by the QRS/T-amplitude ratio of the ventricular paced beat.
Dural M, Ghossein M, Gerrits W, Daniels F, Meine M, Maass A Europace. 2023; 26(1).
PMID: 38146837 PMC: 10766142. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad370.
Cossu S J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2023; 14(8):5552-5557.
PMID: 37650125 PMC: 10464650. DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2023.14085.
Morina-Vazquez P, Moraleda-Salas M, Lopez-Masjuan-Rios A, Esteve-Ruiz I, Arce-Leon A, Lluch-Requerey C J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023; 66(9):2003-2010.
PMID: 36930350 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01526-8.
Verzaal N, van Deursen C, Pezzuto S, Wecke L, Van Everdingen W, Vernooy K J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022; 33(8):1837-1846.
PMID: 35662306 PMC: 9539692. DOI: 10.1111/jce.15581.
Johnson J, Haq K, Lutz K, Peters K, Paternostro K, Craig N BMJ Open. 2021; 11(9):e048542.
PMID: 34479935 PMC: 8420653. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048542.