» Articles » PMID: 19529946

Gleaning Bat Echolocation Calls Do Not Elicit Antipredator Behaviour in the Pacific Field Cricket, Teleogryllus Oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2009 Jun 17
PMID 19529946
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bats that glean prey (capture them from surfaces) produce relatively inconspicuous echolocation calls compared to aerially foraging bats and could therefore be difficult predators to detect, even for insects with ultrasound sensitive ears. In the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus, an auditory interneuron (AN2) responsive to ultrasound is known to elicit turning behaviour, but only when the cricket is in flight. Turning would not save a cricket from a gleaning bat so we tested the hypothesis that AN2 elicits more appropriate antipredator behaviours when crickets are on the ground. The echolocation calls of Nyctophilus geoffroyi, a sympatric gleaning bat, were broadcast to singing male and walking female T. oceanicus. Males did not cease singing and females did not pause walking more than usual in response to the bat calls up to intensities of 82 dB peSPL. Extracellular recordings from the cervical connective revealed that the echolocation calls elicited AN2 action potentials at high firing rates, indicating that the crickets could hear these stimuli. AN2 appears to elicit antipredator behaviour only in flight, and we discuss possible reasons for this context-dependent function.

Citing Articles

Road noise exposure over development increases baseline auditory activity and decision-making time in adult crickets.

Etzler E, Ter Hofstede H, Gwynne D, Ratcliffe J Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):280.

PMID: 39987350 PMC: 11846886. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07643-6.


Crickets alter wind-elicited escape strategies depending on acoustic context.

Fukutomi M, Ogawa H Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):15158.

PMID: 29123249 PMC: 5680309. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15276-x.


Descending brain neurons in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer): auditory responses and impact on walking.

Zorovic M, Hedwig B J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2012; 199(1):25-34.

PMID: 23104703 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-012-0765-7.


Processing of species-specific auditory patterns in the cricket brain by ascending, local, and descending neurons during standing and walking.

Zorovic M, Hedwig B J Neurophysiol. 2011; 105(5):2181-94.

PMID: 21346206 PMC: 3094176. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00416.2010.


The cercal organ may provide singing tettigoniids a backup sensory system for the detection of eavesdropping bats.

Hartbauer M, Ofner E, Grossauer V, Siemers B PLoS One. 2010; 5(9):e12698.

PMID: 20856887 PMC: 2938355. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012698.

References
1.
Schul J, Schulze W . Phonotaxis during walking and flight: are differences in selectivity due to predation pressure?. Naturwissenschaften. 2001; 88(10):438-42. DOI: 10.1007/s001140100262. View

2.
Faulkes Z, Pollack G . Effects of inhibitory timing on contrast enhancement in auditory circuits in crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus). J Neurophysiol. 2000; 84(3):1247-55. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1247. View

3.
Zuk M, Rotenberry J, Tinghitella R . Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol Lett. 2006; 2(4):521-4. PMC: 1834006. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0539. View

4.
Waters D, Jones G . Echolocation call structure and intensity in five species of insectivorous bats. J Exp Biol. 1995; 198(Pt 2):475-89. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.198.2.475. View

5.
Faure P, Hoy R . Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. I. Tuning and responses to pure tones. J Exp Biol. 2000; 203(Pt 21):3225-42. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.21.3225. View