» Articles » PMID: 19528648

Reproductive Decisions Under Ecological Constraints: It's About Time

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2009 Jun 17
PMID 19528648
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The switch point theorem (SPT) is the quantitative statement of the hypothesis that stochastic effects on survival, mate encounter, and latency affect individuals' time available for mating, the mean and variance in fitness, and thus, originally favored the evolution of individuals able to make adaptively flexible reproductive decisions. The SPT says that demographic stochasticity acting through variation in (i) individual survival probability, s; (ii) individual encounter probability, e; (iii) latency, l; (iv) the number of potential mates in the population, n; and (v) the distribution of fitness conferred, the w distribution, together affect average lifetime fitness, and induce adaptive switches in individual reproductive decisions. The switch point is the rank of potential mates at which focal individuals switch from accepting to rejecting potential mates, a decision rule that the SPT proves maximizes the average lifetime fitness of a focal individual under given values of ecological constraints on time. The SPT makes many predictions, including that the shape of the distribution of fitness conferred affects individual switch points. All else equal, higher probabilities of individual survival and encounter decrease the fraction of acceptable potential mates, such that focal individuals achieve higher average lifetime fitness by rejecting more potential mates. The primary prediction of the SPT is that each decision a focal individual makes is determined jointly by e, s, l, n, and the w distribution.

Citing Articles

Probabilistic inference and Bayesian-like estimation in animals: Empirical evidence.

Valone T Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(7):e11495.

PMID: 38994217 PMC: 11237346. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11495.


Matching provides efficient decisions.

Kubanek J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38464109 PMC: 10925186. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.15.580481.


Transient polymorphisms in parental care strategies drive divergence of sex roles.

Long X, Weissing F Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):6805.

PMID: 37884497 PMC: 10603145. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42607-6.


The history of sexual selection research provides insights as to why females are still understudied.

Ah-King M Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):6976.

PMID: 36379954 PMC: 9666445. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34770-z.


Polyandrous females but not monogamous females vary in reproductive ageing patterns in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris.

Park Y, Shin D, Han C BMC Ecol Evol. 2022; 22(1):115.

PMID: 36217117 PMC: 9549660. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-022-02070-1.


References
1.
Parker G, Baker R, SMITH V . The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. J Theor Biol. 1972; 36(3):529-53. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(72)90007-0. View

2.
Gowaty P, Anderson W, Bluhm C, Drickamer L, Kim Y, Moore A . The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(38):15023-7. PMC: 1986606. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706622104. View

3.
Platt J . Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science. 1964; 146(3642):347-53. DOI: 10.1126/science.146.3642.347. View

4.
Bateman A . Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb). 1948; 2(Pt. 3):349-68. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1948.21. View

5.
Gowaty P . Reproductive compensation. J Evol Biol. 2008; 21(5):1189-200. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01559.x. View