» Articles » PMID: 19528080

Classification and Energetics of the Base-phosphate Interactions in RNA

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2009 Jun 17
PMID 19528080
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Structured RNA molecules form complex 3D architectures stabilized by multiple interactions involving the nucleotide base, sugar and phosphate moieties. A significant percentage of the bases in structured RNA molecules in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) hydrogen-bond with phosphates of other nucleotides. By extracting and superimposing base-phosphate (BPh) interactions from a reduced-redundancy subset of 3D structures from the PDB, we identified recurrent phosphate-binding sites on the RNA bases. Quantum chemical calculations were carried out on model systems representing each BPh interaction. The calculations show that the centers of each cluster obtained from the structure superpositions correspond to energy minima on the potential energy hypersurface. The calculations also show that the most stable phosphate-binding sites occur on the Watson-Crick edge of guanine and the Hoogsteen edge of cytosine. We modified the 'Find RNA 3D' (FR3D) software suite to automatically find and classify BPh interactions. Comparison of the 3D structures of the 16S and 23S rRNAs of Escherichia coli and Thermus thermophilus revealed that most BPh interactions are phylogenetically conserved and they occur primarily in hairpin, internal or junction loops or as part of tertiary interactions. Bases that form BPh interactions, which are conserved in the rRNA 3D structures are also conserved in homologous rRNA sequence alignments.

Citing Articles

Simple Adjustment of Intranucleotide Base-Phosphate Interaction in the OL3 AMBER Force Field Improves RNA Simulations.

Mlynsky V, Kuhrova P, Stadlbauer P, Krepl M, Otyepka M, Banas P J Chem Theory Comput. 2023; 19(22):8423-8433.

PMID: 37944118 PMC: 10687871. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00990.


Crystallization as a selection force at the polymerization of nucleotides in a prebiotic context.

Sponer J, Sponer J, Vyravsky J, Matyasek R, Kovarik A, Dudziak W iScience. 2023; 26(9):107600.

PMID: 37664611 PMC: 10470394. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107600.


A comprehensive survey of long-range tertiary interactions and motifs in non-coding RNA structures.

Bohdan D, Voronina V, Bujnicki J, Baulin E Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 51(16):8367-8382.

PMID: 37471030 PMC: 10484739. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad605.


Occurrence and classification of T-shaped interactions between nucleobases in RNA structures.

Ali Z, Kukhta T, Jhunjhunwala A, Trant J, Sharma P RNA. 2023; 29(8):1215-1229.

PMID: 37188492 PMC: 10351890. DOI: 10.1261/rna.079486.122.


Anionic G•U pairs in bacterial ribosomal rRNAs.

Westhof E, Watson Z, Zirbel C, Cate J RNA. 2023; 29(7):1069-1076.

PMID: 37068913 PMC: 10275268. DOI: 10.1261/rna.079583.123.


References
1.
Auffinger P, Bielecki L, Westhof E . Anion binding to nucleic acids. Structure. 2004; 12(3):379-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2004.02.015. View

2.
Leontis N, Stombaugh J, Westhof E . Motif prediction in ribosomal RNAs Lessons and prospects for automated motif prediction in homologous RNA molecules. Biochimie. 2002; 84(9):961-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9084(02)01463-3. View

3.
Moazed D, Stern S, Noller H . Rapid chemical probing of conformation in 16 S ribosomal RNA and 30 S ribosomal subunits using primer extension. J Mol Biol. 1986; 187(3):399-416. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90441-9. View

4.
Leroy J, Broseta D, Gueron M . Proton exchange and base-pair kinetics of poly(rA).poly(rU) and poly(rI).poly(rC). J Mol Biol. 1985; 184(1):165-78. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90050-6. View

5.
Stombaugh J, Zirbel C, Westhof E, Leontis N . Frequency and isostericity of RNA base pairs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37(7):2294-312. PMC: 2673412. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp011. View