» Articles » PMID: 19525773

Examination of the Relationship Between Public Health Statute Modernization and Local Public Health System Performance

Overview
Date 2009 Jun 16
PMID 19525773
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Wide variation in performance of public health (PH) systems, coupled with national interest in improving PH system quality, makes it a priority to identify factors associated with performance. One factor may be congruence between a state's PH enabling statutes and the obligations outlined in Public Health in America-the collaboratively developed framework that defines the mission and essential services (ESs) of PH.

Subjects: This research examined the relationship between (1) the degree to which language in a state's PH enabling statutes reflects PH's mission and ESs and (2) the performance of local public health systems in delivering ESs, measured by National Public Health Performance Standards scores in 207 local jurisdictions.

Methods: Binary logistic regression demonstrated that a high degree of congruence between statutory language and public health's mission increased the odds of above-average system performance for 5 of 10 ESs.

Results: High levels of congruence between statutory language and the ESs themselves increased odds of above-average system performance for 6 of 10 ESs. Results yielded modest odds ratios (<2.0).

Conclusions: Limitations of the data make it impossible to draw firm conclusions; however, these modest results suggest that statutory language may account for little of the variation in local public health system performance.

Citing Articles

Minimum package of public health services: the adoption of core services in local public health agencies in Colorado.

Lampe S, Atherly A, VanRaemdonck L, Matthews K, Marshall J Am J Public Health. 2015; 105 Suppl 2:S252-9.

PMID: 25689203 PMC: 4355702. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302173.


Moving from intersection to integration: public health law research and public health systems and services research.

Burris S, Mays G, Scutchfield F, Ibrahim J Milbank Q. 2012; 90(2):375-408.

PMID: 22709392 PMC: 3460210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00667.x.

References
1.
Bekemeier B, Riley C, Padgett S, Berkowitz B . Making the case: leveraging resources toward public health system improvement in Turning Point states. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007; 13(6):649-54. DOI: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000296143.87046.85. View

2.
Joly B, ORourke K, Tilson H, Leonard J . Use of national public health performance standards to assess Maine's diabetes system. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2006; 13(1):68-71. DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200701000-00011. View

3.
Erwin P . The performance of local health departments: a review of the literature. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008; 14(2):E9-18. DOI: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311903.34067.89. View

4.
Mays G, McHugh M, Shim K, Lenaway D, Halverson P, Moonesinghe R . Getting what you pay for: public health spending and the performance of essential public health services. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004; 10(5):435-43. DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200409000-00011. View

5.
Mays G, McHugh M, Shim K, Perry N, Halverson P, Lenaway D . Identifying dimensions of performance in local public health systems: results from the National Public Health Performance Standards Program. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004; 10(3):193-203. DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200405000-00003. View