» Articles » PMID: 1950917

Effects of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Administration After Osmotic Blood-brain Barrier Disruption: Toxicity and MR Imaging Findings

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 1991 Sep 1
PMID 1950917
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption with intraarterial chemotherapy has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of malignant brain tumors. Imaging blood-brain barrier disruption is necessary to document the extent and degree of disruption and to correlate disruption with drug delivery. The present study evaluated blood-brain barrier disruption with gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging and the associated toxicity of gadopentetate dimeglumine administration. Blood-brain barrier disruption was performed in seven dogs for imaging analysis and 17 dogs for toxicity evaluation. In the absence of gadopentetate dimeglumine administration, blood-brain barrier disruption could not be imaged. Enhanced MR imaging with a gadopentetate dimeglumine dose of 0.1 mmol/kg provided good images of disruption at an imaging time of 3 hr after disruption. However, when gadopentetate dimeglumine was given intravenously in conjunction with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption, there was a statistically significant (p = .02) dose-dependent increase in the frequency of seizures, with 50% of the animals who received 0.1 mmol/kg and 75% who received 0.2 mmol/kg developing delayed seizures. Our findings show that, as with ionized iodinated CT contrast agents, gadopentetate dimeglumine is associated with toxicity when used in conjunction with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in dogs. Such toxicity may be a contraindication to the use of gadopentetate dimeglumine for monitoring patients with osmotically induced disruption of the blood-brain barrier.

Citing Articles

Improved Detection of Bone Metastases in Children and Young Adults with Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI.

Rashidi A, Baratto L, Theruvath A, Greene E, Jayapal P, Hawk K Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023; 5(2):e220080.

PMID: 36999999 PMC: 10077085. DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220080.


Does Gadolinium Deposition Lead to Metabolite Alteration in the Dentate Nucleus? An MRS Study in Patients with MS.

Mohammadzadeh M, Kolahi S, Mehrabi Nejad M, Firouznia K, Naghibi H, Mohammadzadeh A AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022; 43(10):1403-1410.

PMID: 36574329 PMC: 9575534. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7623.


How to stop using gadolinium chelates for magnetic resonance imaging: clinical-translational experiences with ferumoxytol.

Daldrup-Link H, Theruvath A, Rashidi A, Iv M, Majzner R, Spunt S Pediatr Radiol. 2021; 52(2):354-366.

PMID: 34046709 PMC: 8626538. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05098-5.


Safety issues related to intravenous contrast agent use in magnetic resonance imaging.

Ponrartana S, Moore M, Chan S, Victoria T, Dillman J, Chavhan G Pediatr Radiol. 2021; 51(5):736-747.

PMID: 33871726 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04896-7.


Comprehensive phenotyping revealed transient startle response reduction and histopathological gadolinium localization to perineuronal nets after gadodiamide administration in rats.

Habermeyer J, Boyken J, Harrer J, Canneva F, Ratz V, Moceri S Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):22385.

PMID: 33372182 PMC: 7769977. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79374-z.