» Articles » PMID: 19508426

The T-DNA Integration Pattern in Arabidopsis Transformants is Highly Determined by the Transformed Target Cell

Overview
Journal Plant J
Date 2009 Jun 11
PMID 19508426
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transgenic loci obtained after Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation can be simple, but fairly often they contain multiple T-DNA copies integrated into the plant genome. To understand the origin of complex T-DNA loci, floral-dip and root transformation experiments were carried out in Arabidopsis thaliana with mixtures of A. tumefaciens strains, each harboring one or two different T-DNA vectors. Upon floral-dip transformation, 6-30% of the transformants were co-transformed by multiple T-DNAs originating from different bacteria and 20-36% by different T-DNAs from one strain. However, these co-transformation frequencies were too low to explain the presence of on average 4-6 T-DNA copies in these transformants, suggesting that, upon floral-dip transformation, T-DNA replication frequently occurs before or during integration after the transfer of single T-DNA copies. Upon root transformation, the co-transformation frequencies of T-DNAs originating from different bacteria were similar or slightly higher (between 10 and 60%) than those obtained after floral-dip transformation, whereas the co-transformation frequencies of different T-DNAs from one strain were comparable (24-31%). Root transformants generally harbor only one to three T-DNA copies, and thus co-transformation of different T-DNAs can explain the T-DNA copy number in many transformants, but T-DNA replication is postulated to occur in most multicopy root transformants. In conclusion, the comparable co-transformation frequencies and differences in complexity of the T-DNA loci after floral-dip and root transformations indicate that the T-DNA copy number is highly determined by the transformation-competent target cells.

Citing Articles

Improved validation of protein interactions using bicistronic BiFC (Bi2FC).

Sivakumar P, Vaishnavi V, Gayatri K, Satheesh G, Siddiqi I Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2024; 30(7):1047-1054.

PMID: 39100877 PMC: 11291819. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-024-01477-y.


Boosting genome editing in plants with single transcript unit surrogate reporter systems.

Tang X, Ren Q, Yan X, Zhang R, Liu L, Han Q Plant Commun. 2024; 5(6):100921.

PMID: 38616491 PMC: 11211634. DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100921.


Analysis of the Candidate Genes and Underlying Molecular Mechanism of P198, an RNAi-Related Dwarf and Sterile Line.

Zhao S, Luo J, Tang M, Zhang C, Song M, Wu G Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(1).

PMID: 38203344 PMC: 10778984. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010174.


An accurate, reliable, and universal qPCR method to identify homozygous single insert T-DNA with the example of transgenic rice.

Tran H, Schramm C, Huynh M, Shavrukov Y, Stangoulis J, Jenkins C Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1221790.

PMID: 37900763 PMC: 10600460. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1221790.


Genomic consequences associated with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plants.

Thomson G, Dickinson L, Jacob Y Plant J. 2023; 117(2):342-363.

PMID: 37831618 PMC: 10841553. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16496.