» Articles » PMID: 19505451

Semantic Richness and the Activation of Concepts in Semantic Memory: Evidence from Event-related Potentials

Overview
Journal Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2009 Jun 10
PMID 19505451
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Semantic richness refers to the amount of semantic information associated with a concept. Reaction-time (RT) studies have shown that words referring to rich concepts elicit faster responses than those referring to impoverished ones, suggesting that richer concepts are activated more quickly. In a recent functional neuroimaging study, richer concepts evoked less neural activity, which was interpreted as faster activation. The interpretations of these findings appear to conflict with event-related potential (ERP) studies showing no evidence that speed of concept activation is influenced by typical semantic variables. Resolution of this apparent contradiction is important because the interpretation of 40 years of semantic-memory RT studies depends on whether factors such as semantic richness influence the duration of initial concept activation or later decision and response processes. Consistent with previous studies of the effects of semantic factors on ERP, the present study shows that richness influences the magnitude, but not the latency, of the P2 and N400 ERP components (which are early relative to behavioral responses), suggesting that effects of richness on RT reflect temporal effects on downstream decision or response mechanisms rather than on upstream concept activation.

Citing Articles

A predictive coding model of the N400.

Nour Eddine S, Brothers T, Wang L, Spratling M, Kuperberg G Cognition. 2024; 246:105755.

PMID: 38428168 PMC: 10984641. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105755.


The retrogenesis of age-related decline in declarative and procedural memory.

Xie C, Fong M, Ma M, Wang J, Wang W Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1212614.

PMID: 37575428 PMC: 10413564. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212614.


Recognition of brief sounds in rapid serial auditory presentation.

Akca M, Vuoskoski J, Laeng B, Bishop L PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284396.

PMID: 37053212 PMC: 10101377. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284396.


Context matters: How do task demands modulate the recruitment of sensorimotor information during language processing?.

Muraki E, Doyle A, Protzner A, Pexman P Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 16:976954.

PMID: 36733894 PMC: 9886877. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.976954.


Neural Responses to Novel and Existing Words in Children with Autism Spectrum and Developmental Language Disorder.

Knowland V, Baker D, Gaskell M, van Rijn E, Walker S, Norbury C J Cogn. 2022; 5(1):14.

PMID: 36072108 PMC: 9400667. DOI: 10.5334/joc.204.


References
1.
McRae K, Cree G, Seidenberg M, McNorgan C . Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behav Res Methods. 2006; 37(4):547-59. DOI: 10.3758/bf03192726. View

2.
Pexman P, Hargreaves I, Edwards J, Henry L, Goodyear B . The neural consequences of semantic richness: when more comes to mind, less activation is observed. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(5):401-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01913.x. View

3.
Kounios J, Holcomb P . Structure and process in semantic memory: evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992; 121(4):459-79. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.121.4.459. View

4.
Kounios J, Osman A, Meyer D . Structure and process in semantic memory: new evidence based on speed-accuracy decomposition. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1987; 116(1):3-25. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.116.1.3. View

5.
Holcomb P . Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology. 1993; 30(1):47-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03204.x. View