» Articles » PMID: 19490643

The Spatial Distribution of Radiodense Breast Tissue: a Longitudinal Study

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2009 Jun 4
PMID 19490643
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Mammographic breast density is one of the strongest known markers of susceptibility to breast cancer. To date research into density has relied on a single measure (for example, percent density (PD)) summarising the average level of density for the whole breast, with no consideration of how the radiodense tissue may be distributed. This study aims to investigate the spatial distribution of density within the breast using 493 mammographic images from a sample of 165 premenopausal women (~3 medio-lateral oblique views per woman).

Methods: Each breast image was divided into 48 regions and the PD for the whole breast (overall PD) and for each one of its regions (regional PD) was estimated. The spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I value) of regional PD for each image was calculated to investigate spatial clustering of density, whether the degree of clustering varied between a woman's two breasts and whether it was affected by age and other known density correlates.

Results: The median Moran's I value for 165 women was 0.31 (interquartile range: 0.26, 0.37), indicating a clustered pattern. High-density areas tended to cluster in the central regions of the breast, regardless of the level of overall PD, but with considerable between-woman variability in regional PD. The degree of clustering was similar between a woman's two breasts (mean within-woman difference in Moran's I values between left and right breasts = 0.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.01, 0.01); P = 0.76) and did not change with aging (mean within-woman difference in I values between screens taken on average 8 years apart = 0.01 (95% CI = -0.01, 0.02); P = 0.30). Neither parity nor age at first birth affected the level of spatial autocorrelation of density, but increasing body mass index (BMI) was associated with a decrease in the degree of spatial clustering.

Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate that the distribution of radiodense tissue within the breast is spatially autocorrelated, generally with the high-density areas clustering in the central regions of the breast. The degree of clustering was similar within a woman's two breasts and between women, and was little affected by age or reproductive factors although it declined with increasing BMI.

Citing Articles

Reducing False-Positive Biopsies using Deep Neural Networks that Utilize both Local and Global Image Context of Screening Mammograms.

Wu N, Huang Z, Shen Y, Park J, Phang J, Makino T J Digit Imaging. 2021; 34(6):1414-1423.

PMID: 34731338 PMC: 8669066. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00530-6.


Spatial Distribution and Quantification of Mammographic Breast Density, and Its Correlation with BI-RADS Using an Image Segmentation Method.

Goh Y, Lee Z, Lai C Life (Basel). 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34204876 PMC: 8228882. DOI: 10.3390/life11060516.


An interpretable classifier for high-resolution breast cancer screening images utilizing weakly supervised localization.

Shen Y, Wu N, Phang J, Park J, Liu K, Tyagi S Med Image Anal. 2020; 68:101908.

PMID: 33383334 PMC: 7828643. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101908.


Virtual assessment of stereoscopic viewing of digital breast tomosynthesis projection images.

Wen G, Chang H, Reinhold J, Lo J, Markey M J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018; 5(1):015501.

PMID: 29376103 PMC: 5771135. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.015501.


Breast Tissue Organisation and its Association with Breast Cancer Risk.

Ali M, Czene K, Eriksson L, Hall P, Humphreys K Breast Cancer Res. 2017; 19(1):103.

PMID: 28877713 PMC: 5586066. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-017-0894-6.


References
1.
Jayasinghe U, Boyages J . Tumour location is not an independent prognostic factor for survival following a diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast. 2008; 18(1):41-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.10.004. View

2.
Boyd N, Martin L, Stone J, Little L, Minkin S, Yaffe M . A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11(10 Pt 1):1048-53. View

3.
Crum W, Tanner C, Hawkes D . Anisotropic multi-scale fluid registration: evaluation in magnetic resonance breast imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2005; 50(21):5153-74. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/21/014. View

4.
Rueckert D, Sonoda L, Hayes C, Hill D, Leach M, Hawkes D . Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999; 18(8):712-21. DOI: 10.1109/42.796284. View

5.
More M, Narayanan D, Goodale P, Harvey J, Williams M . Analysis of spatial correlation between 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake and radiographic breast density. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2005; 4(3):265-73. DOI: 10.1177/153303460500400306. View