Fpocket: an Open Source Platform for Ligand Pocket Detection

Overview

Journal BMC Bioinformatics

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Biology

Date 2009 Jun 3

PMID 19486540

Citations 538

Authors

Vincent Le Guilloux

Peter Schmidtke

Pierre Tuffery

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Virtual screening methods start to be well established as effective approaches to identify hits, candidates and leads for drug discovery research. Among those, structure based virtual screening (SBVS) approaches aim at docking collections of small compounds in the target structure to identify potent compounds. For SBVS, the identification of candidate pockets in protein structures is a key feature, and the recent years have seen increasing interest in developing methods for pocket and cavity detection on protein surfaces.

Results: Fpocket is an open source pocket detection package based on Voronoi tessellation and alpha spheres built on top of the publicly available package Qhull. The modular source code is organised around a central library of functions, a basis for three main programs: (i) Fpocket, to perform pocket identification, (ii) Tpocket, to organise pocket detection benchmarking on a set of known protein-ligand complexes, and (iii) Dpocket, to collect pocket descriptor values on a set of proteins. Fpocket is written in the C programming language, which makes it a platform well suited for the scientific community willing to develop new scoring functions and extract various pocket descriptors on a large scale level. Fpocket 1.0, relying on a simple scoring function, is able to detect 94% and 92% of the pockets within the best three ranked pockets from the holo and apo proteins respectively, outperforming the standards of the field, while being faster.

Conclusion: Fpocket provides a rapid, open source and stable basis for further developments related to protein pocket detection, efficient pocket descriptor extraction, or drugablity prediction purposes. Fpocket is freely available under the GNU GPL license at http://fpocket.sourceforge.net.

Citing Articles

The novel GSDMD inhibitor GI-Y2 exerts antipyroptotic effects to reduce atherosclerosis.

Fan X, Cheng Z, Shao R, Ye K, Chen X, Cai X Clin Transl Med. 2025; 15(3):e70263.

PMID: 40045452 PMC: 11882392. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.70263.

Structural bioinformatics for rational drug design.

Mozaffari S, Moen A, Ng C, Nicolaes G, Wichapong K Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025; 9(1):102691.

PMID: 40027444 PMC: 11869865. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102691.

Improving Identification of Drug-Target Binding Sites Based on Structures of Targets Using Residual Graph Transformer Network.

Lv S, Zeng X, Su G, Du W, Li Y, Wen M Biomolecules. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001524 PMC: 11853427. DOI: 10.3390/biom15020221.

Repression of apelin Furin cleavage sites provides antimetastatic strategy in colorectal cancer.

Demoures B, Soulet F, Descarpentrie J, Galeano-Otero I, Sanchez Collado J, Casado M EMBO Mol Med. 2025; 17(3):504-534.

PMID: 39962271 PMC: 11904221. DOI: 10.1038/s44321-025-00196-5.

Mapping kinase domain resistance mechanisms for the MET receptor tyrosine kinase via deep mutational scanning.

Estevam G, Linossi E, Rao J, Macdonald C, Ravikumar A, Chrispens K Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39960754 PMC: 11832172. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.101882.

References

Zhong S, MacKerell Jr A . Binding response: a descriptor for selecting ligand binding site on protein surfaces. J Chem Inf Model. 2007; 47(6):2303-15. DOI: 10.1021/ci700149k. View

Murga L, Ondrechen M, Ringe D . Prediction of interaction sites from apo 3D structures when the holo conformation is different. Proteins. 2008; 72(3):980-92. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21995. View

Nayal M, Honig B . On the nature of cavities on protein surfaces: application to the identification of drug-binding sites. Proteins. 2006; 63(4):892-906. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20897. View

Villoutreix B, Bastard K, Sperandio O, Fahraeus R, Poyet J, Calvo F . In silico-in vitro screening of protein-protein interactions: towards the next generation of therapeutics. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2008; 9(2):103-22. DOI: 10.2174/138920108783955218. View

Kim D, Cho C, Cho Y, Ryu J, Bhak J, Kim D . Pocket extraction on proteins via the Voronoi diagram of spheres. J Mol Graph Model. 2007; 26(7):1104-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.10.002. View

Ruppert J, Welch W, Jain A . Automatic identification and representation of protein binding sites for molecular docking. Protein Sci. 1997; 6(3):524-33. PMC: 2143670. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560060302. View

Manly C, Chandrasekhar J, Ochterski J, Hammer J, Warfield B . Strategies and tactics for optimizing the Hit-to-Lead process and beyond--a computational chemistry perspective. Drug Discov Today. 2008; 13(3-4):99-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.10.019. View

Laurie A, Jackson R . Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21(9):1908-16. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti315. View

Del Carpio C, Takahashi Y, Sasaki S . A new approach to the automatic identification of candidates for ligand receptor sites in proteins: (I). Search for pocket regions. J Mol Graph. 1993; 11(1):23-9, 42. DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(93)85003-9. View

10.

Levitt D, BANASZAK L . POCKET: a computer graphics method for identifying and displaying protein cavities and their surrounding amino acids. J Mol Graph. 1992; 10(4):229-34. DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(92)80074-n. View

11.

Hendlich M, Rippmann F, Barnickel G . LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins. J Mol Graph Model. 1998; 15(6):359-63, 389. DOI: 10.1016/s1093-3263(98)00002-3. View

12.

Dundas J, Ouyang Z, Tseng J, Binkowski A, Turpaz Y, Liang J . CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(Web Server issue):W116-8. PMC: 1538779. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl282. View

13.

Glaser F, Morris R, Najmanovich R, Laskowski R, Thornton J . A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures. Proteins. 2005; 62(2):479-88. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20769. View

14.

McGovern S, Shoichet B . Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. J Med Chem. 2003; 46(14):2895-907. DOI: 10.1021/jm0300330. View

15.

Kleywegt G, Jones T . Detection, delineation, measurement and display of cavities in macromolecular structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1994; 50(Pt 2):178-85. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444993011333. View

16.

Peters K, Fauck J, Frommel C . The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria. J Mol Biol. 1996; 256(1):201-13. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0077. View

17.

Yang A, Kallblad P, Mancera R . Molecular modelling prediction of ligand binding site flexibility. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2004; 18(4):235-50. DOI: 10.1023/b:jcam.0000046820.08222.83. View

18.

Brady Jr G, Stouten P . Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2000; 14(4):383-401. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008124202956. View

19.

Goto J, Kataoka R, Muta H, Hirayama N . ASEDock-docking based on alpha spheres and excluded volumes. J Chem Inf Model. 2008; 48(3):583-90. DOI: 10.1021/ci700352q. View

20.

Venkatachalam C, Jiang X, Oldfield T, Waldman M . LigandFit: a novel method for the shape-directed rapid docking of ligands to protein active sites. J Mol Graph Model. 2002; 21(4):289-307. DOI: 10.1016/s1093-3263(02)00164-x. View