» Articles » PMID: 19482858

Accuracy and Precision of a Novel Non-invasive Core Thermometer

Overview
Journal Br J Anaesth
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2009 Jun 2
PMID 19482858
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurate measurement of core temperature is a standard component of perioperative and intensive care patient management. However, core temperature measurements are difficult to obtain in awake patients. A new non-invasive thermometer has been developed, combining two sensors separated by a known thermal resistance ('double-sensor' thermometer). We thus evaluated the accuracy of the double-sensor thermometer compared with a distal oesophageal thermometer to determine if the double-sensor thermometer is a suitable substitute.

Methods: In perioperative and intensive care patient populations (n=68 total), double-sensor measurements were compared with measurements from a distal oesophageal thermometer using Bland-Altman analysis and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

Results: Overall, 1287 measurement pairs were obtained at 5 min intervals. Ninety-eight per cent of all double-sensor values were within +/-0.5 degrees C of oesophageal temperature. The mean bias between the methods was -0.08 degrees C; the limits of agreement were -0.66 degrees C to 0.50 degrees C. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of fever were 0.86 and 0.97, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of hypothermia were 0.77 and 0.93, respectively. Lin's CCC was 0.93.

Conclusions: The new double-sensor thermometer is sufficiently accurate to be considered an alternative to distal oesophageal core temperature measurement, and may be particularly useful in patients undergoing regional anaesthesia.

Citing Articles

Intraoperative zero-heat-flux thermometry overestimates nasopharyngeal temperature by 0.39 °C: an observational study in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery.

Brandes I, Tirilomis T, Nemeth M, Wieditz J, Brauer A J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 39(1):205-215.

PMID: 39127818 PMC: 11821722. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01204-8.


Agreement between three noninvasive temperature monitoring devices during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a prospective observational study.

Vawda D, King C, Toit L, Dyer R, Masuku N, Bishop D J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 38(5):1199-1207.

PMID: 38687415 PMC: 11427619. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01154-1.


Comparing body temperature measurements using the double sensor method within a wearable device with oral and core body temperature measurements using medical grade thermometers-a short report.

Eisenkraft A, Goldstein N, Fons M, Tabi M, Sherman A, Ben Ishay A Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1279314.

PMID: 38033330 PMC: 10685445. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1279314.


Accuracy of a Dual-Sensor Heat-Flux (DHF) Non-Invasive Core Temperature Sensor in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Surgery.

Zeiner S, Zadrazil M, Willschke H, Wiegele M, Marhofer P, Hammerle F J Clin Med. 2023; 12(22).

PMID: 38002632 PMC: 10672443. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227018.


A Continuously Worn Dual Temperature Sensor System for Accurate Monitoring of Core Body Temperature from the Ear Canal.

Olson K, OBrien P, Lin A, Fabry D, Hanke S, Schroeder M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(17).

PMID: 37687777 PMC: 10490514. DOI: 10.3390/s23177323.