» Articles » PMID: 19475400

Correlates of Individual Differences in Compensatory Nicotine Self-administration in Rats Following a Decrease in Nicotine Unit Dose

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2009 May 29
PMID 19475400
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: The ability of tobacco harm reduction strategies to produce significant reductions in toxin exposure is limited by compensatory increases in smoking behavior. Characterizing factors contributing to the marked individual variability in compensation may be useful for understanding this phenomenon and assessing the feasibility of harm reduction interventions.

Objective: The objective of the study was to use an animal model of human compensatory smoking that involves a decrease in unit dose supporting nicotine self-administration (NSA) to examine potential contributors to individual differences in compensation.

Methods: Rats were trained for NSA during daily 23-h sessions at a unit dose of 0.06 mg/kg/inf until responding was stable. The unit dose was then reduced to 0.03 mg/kg/inf for at least 10 sessions. Following reacquisition of NSA at the training dose and extinction, single-dose nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters were determined.

Results: Decreases in nicotine intake following dose reduction were proportionally less than the decrease in unit dose, indicating partial compensation. Compensatory increases in infusion rates were observed across the course of the 23-h sessions. The magnitude of compensation differed considerably between rats. Rats exhibiting the highest baseline infusion rates exhibited the lowest levels of compensation. Nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly correlated with compensation. Infusion rates immediately returned to pre-reduction levels when baseline conditions were restored.

Conclusions: These findings provide initial insights into correlates of individual differences in compensation following a reduction in nicotine unit dose. The present assay may be useful for characterizing mechanisms and potential consequences of the marked individual differences in compensatory smoking observed in humans.

Citing Articles

Logical fallacies and misinterpretations that hinder progress in translational addiction neuroscience.

Strickland J, Stoops W, Banks M, Gipson C J Exp Anal Behav. 2022; 117(3):384-403.

PMID: 35362559 PMC: 9090969. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.757.


Status and Future Directions of Preclinical Behavioral Pharmacology in Tobacco Regulatory Science.

Lesage M, Smethells J, Harris A Behav Anal (Wash D C). 2018; 18(3):252-274.

PMID: 30214916 PMC: 6130840. DOI: 10.1037/bar0000113.


Abuse liability assessment of an e-cigarette refill liquid using intracranial self-stimulation and self-administration models in rats.

Lesage M, Staley M, Muelken P, Smethells J, Stepanov I, Vogel R Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016; 168:76-88.

PMID: 27627814 PMC: 5257285. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.628.


Individual differences in the behavioral effects of nicotine: A review of the preclinical animal literature.

Falco A, Bevins R Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2015; 138:80-90.

PMID: 26410616 PMC: 4623936. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.09.017.


Predictors of the nicotine reinforcement threshold, compensation, and elasticity of demand in a rodent model of nicotine reduction policy.

Grebenstein P, Burroughs D, Roiko S, Pentel P, Lesage M Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015; 151:181-93.

PMID: 25891231 PMC: 4447604. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.030.


References
1.
Benowitz N, Henningfield J . Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331(2):123-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310212. View

2.
MORGAN S, Gust S, Pickens R, Champagne S, Hughes J . Temporal patterns of smoking topography in the natural environment. Int J Addict. 1985; 20(4):613-21. DOI: 10.3109/10826088509044940. View

3.
Joseph A, Hecht S, Murphy S, Lando H, Carmella S, Gross M . Smoking reduction fails to improve clinical and biological markers of cardiac disease: a randomized controlled trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008; 10(3):471-81. PMC: 4110889. DOI: 10.1080/14622200801901948. View

4.
Lesage M, Keyler D, Collins G, Pentel P . Effects of continuous nicotine infusion on nicotine self-administration in rats: relationship between continuously infused and self-administered nicotine doses and serum concentrations. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003; 170(3):278-286. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1539-2. View

5.
Liu X, Palmatier M, Caggiula A, Donny E, Sved A . Reinforcement enhancing effect of nicotine and its attenuation by nicotinic antagonists in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007; 194(4):463-73. PMC: 2826146. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-007-0863-3. View