» Articles » PMID: 19471978

Comparing Dogs and Great Apes in Their Ability to Visually Track Object Transpositions

Overview
Journal Anim Cogn
Publisher Springer
Date 2009 May 28
PMID 19471978
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Knowing that objects continue to exist after disappearing from sight and tracking invisible object displacements are two basic elements of spatial cognition. The current study compares dogs and apes in an invisible transposition task. Food was hidden under one of two cups in full view of the subject. After that both cups were displaced, systematically varying two main factors, whether cups were crossed during displacement and whether the cups were substituted by the other cup or instead cups were moved to new locations. While the apes were successful in all conditions, the dogs had a strong preference to approach the location where they last saw the reward, especially if this location remained filled. In addition, dogs seem to have special difficulties to track the reward when both containers crossed their path during displacement. These results confirm the substantial difference that exists between great apes and dogs with regard to mental representation abilities required to track the invisible displacements of objects.

Citing Articles

Dog-Owner Relationship and Its Association with Social Cognition in French Bulldogs.

Peterca L, Gobbo E, Zupan Semrov M Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39794959 PMC: 11718994. DOI: 10.3390/ani15010017.


Talking About the Absent and the Abstract: Referential Communication in Language and Gesture.

Luchkina E, Waxman S Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023; 19(6):978-992.

PMID: 37603076 PMC: 10879458. DOI: 10.1177/17456916231180589.


Horses' () Ability to Solve Visible but Not Invisible Displacement Tasks Is Associated With Frustration Behavior and Heart Rate.

Rorvang M, Nicova K, Sassner H, Nawroth C Front Behav Neurosci. 2021; 15:792035.

PMID: 34955782 PMC: 8693624. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.792035.


Sex differences in the behavioral responses of dogs exposed to human chemosignals of fear and happiness.

DAniello B, Fierro B, Scandurra A, Pinelli C, Aria M, Semin G Anim Cogn. 2021; 24(2):299-309.

PMID: 33459909 PMC: 8035118. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01473-9.


Macphail's Null Hypothesis of Vertebrate Intelligence: Insights From Avian Cognition.

Bastos A, Taylor A Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1692.

PMID: 32733351 PMC: 7360938. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01692.


References
1.
Call J . Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol. 2001; 115(2):159-71. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.159. View

2.
Pepperberg I, Willner M, Gravitz L . Development of Piagetian object permanence in a grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol. 1997; 111(1):63-75. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.111.1.63. View

3.
Fiset S, Leblanc V . Invisible displacement understanding in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): the role of visual cues in search behavior. Anim Cogn. 2006; 10(2):211-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0060-5. View

4.
Call J . Inferences about the location of food in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol. 2004; 118(2):232-41. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.232. View

5.
Gagnon S, Dore F . Search behavior in various breeds of adult dogs (Canis familiaris): object permanence and olfactory cues. J Comp Psychol. 1992; 106(1):58-68. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.106.1.58. View