» Articles » PMID: 19466249

Shear Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets: Influence of Saliva Contamination

Overview
Journal J Appl Oral Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2009 May 26
PMID 19466249
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of saliva contamination on shear bond strength and the bond failure pattern of 3 adhesive systems (Transbond XT, AdheSE and Xeno III) on orthodontic metallic brackets bonded to human enamel.

Material And Methods: Seventy-two permanent human molars were cut longitudinally in a mesiodistal direction, producing seventy-two specimens randomly divided into six groups. Each system was tested under 2 different enamel conditions: no contamination and contaminated with saliva. In T, A and X groups, the adhesive systems were applied to the enamel surface in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. In TS, AS and XS groups, saliva was applied to enamel surface followed by adhesive system application. The samples were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, and then tested for shear bond strength in a universal testing machine (Emic, DL 2000) running at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. After bond failure, the enamel surfaces were observed under an optical microscope at 40x magnification.

Results: The control and contaminated groups showed no significant difference in shear bond strength for the same adhesive system. However, shear bond strength of T group (17.03+/-4.91) was significantly higher than that of AS (8.58+/-1.73) and XS (10.39+/-4.06) groups (p<0.05). Regarding the bond failure pattern, TS group had significantly higher scores of no adhesive remaining on the tooth in the bonding area than other groups considering the adhesive remnant index (ARI) used to evaluate the amount of adhesive left on the enamel.

Conclusions: Saliva contamination showed little influence on the 24-h shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Citing Articles

Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with a Self-Adhering Composite in Dry and Saliva-Contaminated Conditions.

Sharifi N, Mohammadi Z, Arab S, Shojaee M, Vafadoost F, Zakerzadeh A Front Dent. 2022; 19:5.

PMID: 35937155 PMC: 9294715. DOI: 10.18502/fid.v19i5.8548.


Effect of silver nanoparticles on the physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of an orthodontic adhesive.

Weidenbach Degrazia F, Leitune V, Garcia I, Arthur R, Samuel S, Collares F J Appl Oral Sci. 2016; 24(4):404-10.

PMID: 27556213 PMC: 4990371. DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720160154.


In vitro antibacterial and remineralizing effect of adhesive containing triazine and niobium pentoxide phosphate inverted glass.

Altmann A, Collares F, Leitune V, Arthur R, Takimi A, Samuel S Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 21(1):93-103.

PMID: 26892472 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1754-y.


Effect of different concentrations of papain gel on orthodontic bracket bonding.

Pithon M, Ferraz C, Oliveira G, Dos Santos A Prog Orthod. 2013; 14:22.

PMID: 24325920 PMC: 4384916. DOI: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-22.


Blood contamination effect on shear bond strength of an orthodontic hydrophilic resin.

Cunha T, Behrens B, Nascimento D, Retamoso L, Lon L, Tanaka O J Appl Oral Sci. 2012; 20(1):89-93.

PMID: 22437684 PMC: 3928778. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000100016.


References
1.
Bishara S, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Denehy G . The effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets when using a self-etch primer. Angle Orthod. 2003; 72(6):554-7. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0554:TEOSCO>2.0.CO;2. View

2.
Garcia-Godoy F . Saliva contamination and bond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 1997; 10(2):83-7. View

3.
Silverstone L, Hicks M, Featherstone M . Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces: an SEM study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985; 110(3):329-32. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0350. View

4.
Movahhed H, Ogaard B, Syverud M . An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27(5):477-83. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji051. View

5.
Brown C, Way D . Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfilled adhesives. Am J Orthod. 1978; 74(6):663-71. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90005-2. View