» Articles » PMID: 19463664

Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Precision Surgical Guides with Varying Occlusogingival Heights: an in Vitro Study

Overview
Journal J Prosthet Dent
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2009 May 26
PMID 19463664
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Statement Of Problem: Surgical guides may interfere with effective use of surgical instrumentation during implant placement in the posterior segments where interocclusal distance may be limited.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the accuracy of posterior implant placement using 3 precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights, and to evaluate the difference in accuracy of implant placement through precision guides as compared to freehand placement.

Material And Methods: Three groups of surgical guides were fabricated with occlusogingival heights of 4, 6, and 8 mm, respectively. A jig was fabricated to allow for accurate positioning in bone substitute blocks. Ninety implants were placed in the mandibular first molar site on a manikin. Thirty implants (Astra Tech AB) were placed for each group, with 15 through the guide and 15 freehand. Distances between a reference implant and each placed implant were measured at both implant and abutment levels using a coordinate measuring machine. Apex position and angular discrepancy were calculated using the coordinates of the centers of the implant platform and of the occlusal aspect of the abutment. Data was assessed using 2-way ANOVA (alpha=.05).

Results: Two-way ANOVA demonstrated that guide height did not significantly affect the accuracy of the implant position. The distance from the reference point to the point of measurement was significantly smaller for placement through the guide compared to freehand placement at both implant (P<.001) and abutment levels (P<.001). The angular discrepancy was also significantly smaller for placement through the guide (P<.001).

Conclusions: Precision surgical guides with 4-mm occlusogingival height allow placement as accurate as precision guides with 8-mm height. Placement through the guide reproduced the target position more accurately than freehand insertion.

Citing Articles

Influence of template design on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery.

Chung J, Park J, Son H, Hong S, Pae A J Adv Prosthodont. 2025; 17(1):22-35.

PMID: 40061028 PMC: 11886405. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2025.17.1.22.


Assessment of Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Surgical Stent Versus Conventional Technique.

Basannavar A, Konwar A, Pal S, Ishaq A, Kondreddy K, Shinde S J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16(Suppl 3):S2761-S2763.

PMID: 39346418 PMC: 11426845. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_389_24.


3D-printed titanium surgical guides for extraction of horizontally impacted lower third molars.

Qi W, Qian J, Zhou W, Li J, Mao B, Wen A Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 27(4):1499-1507.

PMID: 36374352 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04769-3.


Precision and trueness of computer-assisted implant placement using static surgical guides with open and closed sleeves: An in vitro analysis.

Guentsch A, An H, Dentino A Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022; 33(4):441-450.

PMID: 35148444 PMC: 9302989. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13904.


Repeatability of Freehand Implantations Supported with Universal Plastic Sleeves-In Vitro Study.

Zadrozny L, Czajkowska M, Mijiritsky E, Wagner L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(12).

PMID: 32575839 PMC: 7345541. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124453.