» Articles » PMID: 19448162

A Multi-method Process Evaluation for a Skin Cancer Prevention Diffusion Trial

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Health Services
Date 2009 May 19
PMID 19448162
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article describes process evaluation methods for the Pool Cool diffusion trial across 4 years. Pool Cool is a skin cancer prevention program that was found to improve behaviors and environments for sun protection at swimming pools in a randomized efficacy trial, which was followed by a national diffusion trial. The process evaluation focus shifted from measuring program satisfaction to assessing widespread program implementation, barriers and facilitators to implementation, and program maintenance and sustainability. Data collection methods include training surveys, database tracking, field coordinator activity logs, e-mails, surveys of parents, lifeguards and pool managers, and process evaluation interviews and site visits. The data revealed high levels of implementation of major program components when disseminated in the diffusion trial, including sun safety lessons, sun safety signs, and sunscreen use. This article describes program features and participant factors that facilitated local implementation, maintenance and sustainability across dispersed pools such as linkage agents, a packaged program, and adaptations of program elements.

Citing Articles

Sun Safety at Work Canada: a multiple case-study protocol to develop sun safety and heat protection programs and policies for outdoor workers.

Kramer D, Tenkate T, Strahlendorf P, Kushner R, Gardner A, Holness D Implement Sci. 2015; 10:97.

PMID: 26159710 PMC: 4702388. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0277-2.


What strategies are used to build practitioners' capacity to implement community-based interventions and are they effective?: a systematic review.

Leeman J, Calancie L, Hartman M, Escoffery C, Herrmann A, Tague L Implement Sci. 2015; 10:80.

PMID: 26018220 PMC: 4449971. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0272-7.


Randomized Trial of Two Dissemination Strategies for a Skin Cancer Prevention Program in Aquatic Settings.

Glanz K, Escoffery C, Elliott T, Nehl E Am J Public Health. 2014; 105(7):1415-23.

PMID: 25521872 PMC: 4463406. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302224.


Environmental and occupational interventions for primary prevention of cancer: a cross-sectorial policy framework.

Espina C, Porta M, Schuz J, Hernandez Aguado I, Percival R, Dora C Environ Health Perspect. 2013; 121(4):420-6.

PMID: 23384642 PMC: 3620754. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1205897.


Melanoma prevention: are we doing enough? A Canadian perspective.

Joshua A Curr Oncol. 2013; 19(6):e462-7.

PMID: 23300369 PMC: 3503676. DOI: 10.3747/co.19.1222.


References
1.
Shediac-Rizkallah M, BONE L . Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Educ Res. 1998; 13(1):87-108. DOI: 10.1093/her/13.1.87. View

2.
Titler M . Translating research into practice. Am J Nurs. 2007; 107(6 Suppl):26-33. DOI: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000277823.51806.10. View

3.
Israel B, Cummings K, Dignan M, Heaney C, Perales D, Simons-Morton B . Evaluation of health education programs: current assessment and future directions. Health Educ Q. 1995; 22(3):364-89. DOI: 10.1177/109019819402200308. View

4.
Briss P, Brownson R, Fielding J, Zaza S . Developing and using the Guide to Community Preventive Services: lessons learned about evidence-based public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004; 25:281-302. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.050503.153933. View

5.
Baranowski T, Stables G . Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects. Health Educ Behav. 2000; 27(2):157-66. DOI: 10.1177/109019810002700202. View