» Articles » PMID: 19440788

Systemic Inflammatory Response After Kugel Versus Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair: a Prospective Randomized Trial

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2009 May 15
PMID 19440788
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Kugel repair, a minimally invasive technique, has become an alternative to laparoscopic groin hernia repair, but the technique has not been adequately evaluated by assessment of objective parameters. A prospective randomized clinical study was carried out to compare the systemic inflammatory response to surgical trauma and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent groin hernia repair by the Kugel and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic methods.

Methods: Forty consecutive patients admitted for unilateral groin hernia were randomized to Kugel (n = 20) or TEP (n = 20) repair under general anesthesia. Operation time, length of hospital stay, pain severity, time to return to normal activities, cost, and systemic inflammatory and hormone responses to surgical trauma were compared.

Results: There were no significant between-group differences in duration of operation, length of hospital stay, time to return to normal activities, or mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score (p > 0.05 for each). Serum cortisol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations before surgery, and 1 and 24 h after surgery, did not differ significantly in the two groups (p > 0.05). There were no recurrences or complications during follow-up. Cost per patient was US $546 lower in the Kugel group.

Conclusion: Kugel herniorrhaphy is a minimally invasive technique that offers all the advantages of TEP and is more cost-effective.

Citing Articles

Posterior mesh inguinal hernia repairs: a propensity score matched analysis of laparoscopic and robotic versus open approaches.

Reinhorn M, Fullington N, Agarwal D, Olson M, Ott L, Canavan A Hernia. 2022; 27(1):93-104.

PMID: 36125632 PMC: 9931785. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02680-0.


Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus open Lichtenstein hernia repair. Comparison of the systemic inflammatory response and the postoperative pain1.

Quispe M, Junior W Acta Cir Bras. 2019; 34(2):e201900206.

PMID: 30843939 PMC: 6585912. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-8650201900206.


Systemic inflammatory response after hernia repair: a systematic review.

Kokotovic D, Burcharth J, Helgstrand F, Gogenur I Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017; 402(7):1023-1037.

PMID: 28831565 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1618-1.


Assessment of systemic inflammatory response after total extraperitoneal repair and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia.

Vats M, Pandey D, Saha S, Talwar N, Saurabh G, Andley M Hernia. 2016; 21(1):65-71.

PMID: 27838831 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-016-1543-1.


28 day post-operative persisted hypercoagulability after surgery for benign diseases: a prospective cohort study.

Ulrych J, Kvasnicka T, Fryba V, Komarc M, Malikova I, Burget F BMC Surg. 2016; 16:16.

PMID: 27048604 PMC: 4822325. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-016-0128-3.


References
1.
Schwab R, Eissele S, Bruckner U, Gebhard F, Becker H . Systemic inflammatory response after endoscopic (TEP) vs Shouldice groin hernia repair. Hernia. 2004; 8(3):226-32. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-004-0216-7. View

2.
Schroder D, Lloyd L, Boccaccio J, Wesen C . Inguinal hernia recurrence following preperitoneal Kugel patch repair. Am Surg. 2004; 70(2):132-6. View

3.
Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand H, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker S . A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(20):2050-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032651. View

4.
Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Keemers-Gels M, Rosman C, Strobbe L . Pain after open preperitoneal repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2007; 31(9):1751-1757. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9090-7. View

5.
Caldas J, Marba S, Blotta M, Calil R, Morais S, Oliveira R . Accuracy of white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha for diagnosing late neonatal sepsis. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008; 84(6):536-42. DOI: 10.2223/JPED.1838. View