On the R-curve Behavior of Human Tooth Enamel

Overview

Journal Biomaterials

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2009 May 12

PMID 19427691

Citations 49

Authors

Devendra Bajaj

Dwayne D Arola

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In this study the crack growth resistance behavior and fracture toughness of human tooth enamel were quantified using incremental crack growth measures and conventional fracture mechanics. Results showed that enamel undergoes an increase in crack growth resistance (i.e. rising R-curve) with crack extension from the outer to the inner enamel, and that the rise in toughness is a function of distance from the dentin enamel junction (DEJ). The outer enamel exhibited the lowest apparent toughness (0.67+/-0.12 MPam(0.5)), and the inner enamel exhibited a rise in the growth toughness from 1.13 MPam(0.5)/mm to 3.93 MPam(0.5)/mm. The maximum crack growth resistance at fracture (i.e. fracture toughness (K(c))) ranged from 1.79 to 2.37 MPam(0.5). Crack growth in the inner enamel was accompanied by a host of mechanisms operating from the micro- to the nano-scale. Decussation in the inner enamel promoted crack deflection and twist, resulting in a reduction of the local stress intensity at the crack tip. In addition, extrinsic mechanisms such as bridging by unbroken ligaments of the tissue and the organic matrix promoted crack closure. Microcracking due to loosening of prisms was also identified as an active source of energy dissipation. In summary, the unique microstructure of enamel in the decussated region promotes crack growth toughness that is approximately three times that of dentin and over ten times that of bone.

Citing Articles

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Dental Enamel Microcrack Progression After Orthodontic Bracket Debonding Using Optical Coherence Tomography.

Hamdan A, Saleah S, Seong D, Ravichandran N, Wijesinghe R, Han S J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39852563 PMC: 11766427. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16010007.

Stratification of fluoride uptake among enamel crystals with age elucidated by atom probe tomography.

Grimm J, Renteria C, Mukhopadhyay S, Devaraj A, Arola D Commun Mater. 2024; 5(1):270.

PMID: 39713045 PMC: 11659160. DOI: 10.1038/s43246-024-00709-8.

Hierarchically mimicking outer tooth enamel for restorative mechanical compatibility.

Lu J, Deng J, Wei Y, Yang X, Zhao H, Zhao Q Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10182.

PMID: 39580511 PMC: 11585591. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54576-5.

The intricacies of tooth enamel: Embryonic origin, development and human genetics.

Duverger O, Lee J J Struct Biol. 2024; 216(4):108135.

PMID: 39384002 PMC: 11645192. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2024.108135.

Concept of a Novel Glass Ionomer Restorative Material with Improved Mechanical Properties.

Messer-Hannemann P, Bottcher H, Henning S, Schwendicke F, Effenberger S J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(11).

PMID: 37998103 PMC: 10672254. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14110534.

References

Soappman M, Nazari A, Porter J, Arola D . A comparison of fatigue crack growth in resin composite, dentin and the interface. Dent Mater. 2006; 23(5):608-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.05.003. View

Park S, Wang D, Zhang D, Romberg E, Arola D . Mechanical properties of human enamel as a function of age and location in the tooth. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007; 19(6):2317-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3340-y. View

Rasmussen S, Patchin R . Fracture properties of human enamel and dentin in an aqueous environment. J Dent Res. 1984; 63(12):1362-8. DOI: 10.1177/00220345840630120501. View

He L, Fujisawa N, Swain M . Elastic modulus and stress-strain response of human enamel by nano-indentation. Biomaterials. 2006; 27(24):4388-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.045. View

Kruzic J, Nalla R, Kinney J, Ritchie R . Crack blunting, crack bridging and resistance-curve fracture mechanics in dentin: effect of hydration. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(28):5209-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00458-7. View

Nazari A, Bajaj D, Zhang D, Romberg E, Arola D . Aging and the reduction in fracture toughness of human dentin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009; 2(5):550-9. PMC: 2705210. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.01.008. View

Lin C, Douglas W . Structure-property relations and crack resistance at the bovine dentin-enamel junction. J Dent Res. 1994; 73(5):1072-8. DOI: 10.1177/00220345940730050901. View

Palmer L, Newcomb C, Kaltz S, Spoerke E, Stupp S . Biomimetic systems for hydroxyapatite mineralization inspired by bone and enamel. Chem Rev. 2008; 108(11):4754-83. PMC: 2593885. DOI: 10.1021/cr8004422. View

Xie Z, Swain M, Munroe P, Hoffman M . On the critical parameters that regulate the deformation behaviour of tooth enamel. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(17):2697-703. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.022. View

10.

Imbeni V, Kruzic J, Marshall G, Marshall S, Ritchie R . The dentin-enamel junction and the fracture of human teeth. Nat Mater. 2005; 4(3):229-32. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1323. View

11.

Kodaka T, Kuroiwa M, Abe M . Fine structure of the inner enamel in human permanent teeth. Scanning Microsc. 1990; 4(4):975-85. View

12.

Xu H, Smith D, Jahanmir S, Romberg E, Kelly J, Thompson V . Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res. 1998; 77(3):472-80. DOI: 10.1177/00220345980770030601. View

13.

Chen H, Clarkson B, Sun K, Mansfield J . Self-assembly of synthetic hydroxyapatite nanorods into an enamel prism-like structure. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2005; 288(1):97-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.02.064. View

14.

Pezzotti G, Sakakura S . Study of the toughening mechanisms in bone and biomimetic hydroxyapatite materials using Raman microprobe spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003; 65(2):229-36. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.10447. View

15.

White S, Luo W, Paine M, Fong H, Sarikaya M, Snead M . Biological organization of hydroxyapatite crystallites into a fibrous continuum toughens and controls anisotropy in human enamel. J Dent Res. 2001; 80(1):321-6. DOI: 10.1177/00220345010800010501. View

16.

Rasmussen S, Patchin R, Scott D, Heuer A . Fracture properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res. 1976; 55(1):154-64. DOI: 10.1177/00220345760550010901. View

17.

Koester K, Ager 3rd J, Ritchie R . The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks. Nat Mater. 2008; 7(8):672-7. DOI: 10.1038/nmat2221. View

18.

Braly A, Darnell L, Mann A, Teaford M, Weihs T . The effect of prism orientation on the indentation testing of human molar enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2007; 52(9):856-60. PMC: 2040059. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.03.005. View

19.

Vashishth D, Behiri J, Bonfield W . Crack growth resistance in cortical bone: concept of microcrack toughening. J Biomech. 1997; 30(8):763-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00029-8. View

20.

Hassan R, Caputo A, Bunshah R . Fracture toughness of human enamel. J Dent Res. 1981; 60(4):820-7. DOI: 10.1177/00220345810600040901. View