» Articles » PMID: 19413731

Effects of Storage and Leukoreduction on Lymphocytes and Epstein-Barr Virus Genomes in Platelet Concentrates

Overview
Journal Transfusion
Specialty Hematology
Date 2009 May 6
PMID 19413731
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) persists in infected B lymphocytes in blood donors. Lymphocytes are viable during platelet (PLT) storage. The effects of storage and leukoreduction on lymphocytes and EBV genomes are evaluated.

Study Design And Methods: Forty nonleukoreduced PLT concentrates were stored at 20 to 24°C for up to 7 days. EBV genomes in B cells were quantified on Days 1 and 5. Viable white blood cells (WBCs) and T and B cells were quantified in 10 of 40 units on Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 of storage. For the leukoreduction study, four pools of PLTs were leukoreduced within 24 hours of collection. B cells from before leukoreduction and all peripheral blood mononuclear cells from after leukoreduction were assayed for EBV.

Results: Viable WBCs and T cells were stable whereas viable B cells were reduced to 71% of the Day 1 level by Day 5. A total of 31 of 37 (83.8%) units were EBV positive. Although EBV genomes remained stable in most units, 12 of 37 units demonstrated a median of 5.1 (range 2- to 134)-fold increase in EBV genomes per 105 B cells on Day 5. For the leukoreduction study, EBV genomes were detected in four of four pools before leukoreduction with a median of 3.8 (range, 0.2-93.6) EBV genomes per 105 B cells. EBV genomes were not detected in any of the postleukoreduction specimens.

Conclusions: Seventy percent of B lymphocytes are viable on Day 5 of PLT storage. Although the mean number of EBV genomes remained stable, a subset of units had increased EBV genomes during storage. Leukoreduction removed polymerase chain reaction-detectable EBV genomes from PLT pools.

Citing Articles

Is dual testing for hepatitis C necessary? Modelling the risk of removing hepatitis C antibody testing for Australian blood donations.

Roy Choudhury A, Hoad V, Seed C, Bentley P Vox Sang. 2023; 118(6):480-487.

PMID: 37183505 PMC: 10952898. DOI: 10.1111/vox.13430.


Epstein-Barr Virus Epidemiology, Serology, and Genetic Variability of LMP-1 Oncogene Among Healthy Population: An Update.

Smatti M, Al-Sadeq D, Ali N, Pintus G, Abou-Saleh H, Nasrallah G Front Oncol. 2018; 8:211.

PMID: 29951372 PMC: 6008310. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00211.


Leucoreduction of blood components: an effective way to increase blood safety?.

Bianchi M, Vaglio S, Pupella S, Marano G, Facco G, Liumbruno G Blood Transfus. 2015; 14(2):214-27.

PMID: 26710353 PMC: 4918553. DOI: 10.2450/2015.0154-15.

References
1.
Qu L, Triulzi D, Rowe D, Griffin D, Donnenberg A . Stability of lymphocytes and Epstein-Barr virus during red blood cell storage. Vox Sang. 2007; 92(2):125-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00880.x. View

2.
Babcock G, Decker L, Volk M, Thorley-Lawson D . EBV persistence in memory B cells in vivo. Immunity. 1998; 9(3):395-404. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80622-6. View

3.
Rowe D, Qu L, Reyes J, Jabbour N, Yunis E, PUTNAM P . Use of quantitative competitive PCR to measure Epstein-Barr virus genome load in the peripheral blood of pediatric transplant patients with lymphoproliferative disorders. J Clin Microbiol. 1997; 35(6):1612-5. PMC: 229802. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1612-1615.1997. View

4.
Alfieri C, Tanner J, Carpentier L, Perpete C, Savoie A, Paradis K . Epstein-Barr virus transmission from a blood donor to an organ transplant recipient with recovery of the same virus strain from the recipient's blood and oropharynx. Blood. 1996; 87(2):812-7. View

5.
Qu L, Rowe D . Epstein-Barr virus latent gene expression in uncultured peripheral blood lymphocytes. J Virol. 1992; 66(6):3715-24. PMC: 241156. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.66.6.3715-3724.1992. View