» Articles » PMID: 19409075

Genomic Expression Dominance in Allopolyploids

Overview
Journal BMC Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2009 May 5
PMID 19409075
Citations 121
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Allopolyploid speciation requires rapid evolutionary reconciliation of two diverged genomes and gene regulatory networks. Here we describe global patterns of gene expression accompanying genomic merger and doubling in inter-specific crosses in the cotton genus (Gossypium L.).

Results: Employing a micro-array platform designed against 40,430 unigenes, we assayed gene expression in two sets of parental diploids and their colchicine-doubled allopolyploid derivatives. Up to half of all genes were differentially expressed among diploids, a striking level of expression evolution among congeners. In the allopolyploids, most genes were expressed at mid-parent levels, but this was achieved via a phenomenon of genome-wide expression dominance, whereby gene expression was either up- or down-regulated to the level of one of the two parents, independent of the magnitude of gene expression. This massive expression dominance was approximately equal with respect to direction (up- or down-regulation), and the same diploid parent could be either the dominant or the recessive genome depending on the specific genomic combination. Transgressive up- and down-regulation were also common in the allopolyploids, both for genes equivalently or differentially expressed between the parents.

Conclusion: Our data provide novel insights into the architecture of gene expression in the allopolyploid nucleus, raise questions regarding the responsible underlying mechanisms of genome dominance, and provide clues into the enigma of the evolutionary prevalence of allopolyploids.

Citing Articles

Transgressive expression and dosage effect of A09 chromosome genes and their homoeologous genes influence the flowering time of resynthesized allopolyploid Brassica napus.

Bai Y, Zhao K, Wang B, Wu L, Xiong Z BMC Plant Biol. 2025; 25(1):226.

PMID: 39972272 PMC: 11837392. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-025-06236-z.


Homoeologs in Allopolyploids: Navigating Redundancy as Both an Evolutionary Opportunity and a Technical Challenge-A Transcriptomics Perspective.

Aufiero G, Fruggiero C, DAngelo D, DAgostino N Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 39202338 PMC: 11353593. DOI: 10.3390/genes15080977.


Transcriptome analysis reveals the key role of overdominant expression of photosynthetic and respiration-related genes in the formation of tobacco(Nicotiana tabacum L.) biomass heterosis.

Lu A, Zeng S, Pi K, Long B, Mo Z, Liu R BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):598.

PMID: 38877410 PMC: 11177473. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10507-8.


Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of a potential model organism Gossypium arboreum ZB-1.

Sun R, Wu Y, Zhang X, Lv M, Yu D, Sun Y Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):620.

PMID: 38866802 PMC: 11169495. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03481-z.


Evolutionary Dynamics of Chromatin Structure and Duplicate Gene Expression in Diploid and Allopolyploid Cotton.

Hu G, Grover C, Vera D, Lung P, Girimurugan S, Miller E Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(5).

PMID: 38758089 PMC: 11140268. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae095.


References
1.
Liu Z, Adams K . Expression partitioning between genes duplicated by polyploidy under abiotic stress and during organ development. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(19):1669-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.030. View

2.
Wendel J . Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol Biol. 2000; 42(1):225-49. View

3.
Adams K, Wendel J . Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005; 8(2):135-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.001. View

4.
Chen M, Ha M, Lackey E, Wang J, Chen Z . RNAi of met1 reduces DNA methylation and induces genome-specific changes in gene expression and centromeric small RNA accumulation in Arabidopsis allopolyploids. Genetics. 2008; 178(4):1845-58. PMC: 2323781. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.086272. View

5.
Hubbell E, Liu W, Mei R . Robust estimators for expression analysis. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18(12):1585-92. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.12.1585. View