» Articles » PMID: 19395086

Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements Using Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherent Tomography

Overview
Journal Ophthalmology
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2009 Apr 28
PMID 19395086
Citations 84
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the agreement between peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements from Stratus time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Cirrus spectral domain OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) in normal subjects and subjects with glaucoma.

Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology.

Participants: A total of 130 eyes from 130 normal subjects and subjects with glaucoma were analyzed. The subjects were divided into groups by visual field criteria: normal (n = 29), glaucoma suspect (n = 12), mild glaucoma (n = 41), moderate glaucoma (n = 18), and severe glaucoma (n = 30).

Methods: Peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured with Stratus Fast RNFL and Cirrus 200 x 200 Optic Disc Scan on the same day in 1 eye of each subject to determine agreement. Two operators used the same instruments for all scans.

Main Outcome Measures: Student paired t testing, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis of RNFL thickness measurements.

Results: The average age of the glaucoma group was significantly more than that of the normal group: 68.3+/-12.3 years versus 55.7+/-12.1 years, respectively. For Stratus OCT, the average RNFL thickness (mean +/- standard deviation) was 99.4+/-13.2 microm, 94.5+/-15.0 microm, 79.0+/-14.5 microm, 62.7+/-10.2 microm, and 51.0+/-8.9 microm for the normal, suspect, mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. For Cirrus OCT, the corresponding measurements were 92.0+/-10.8 microm, 88.1+/-13.5 microm, 73.3+/-11.8 microm, 60.9+/-8.3 microm, and 55.3+/-6.6 microm. All Stratus-Cirrus differences were statistically significant by paired t testing (P<0.001) except for the moderate group (P = 0.11). For average RNFL, there was also a highly significant linear relationship between Stratus minus Cirrus difference and RNFL thickness (P<0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed that the systematic difference of Stratus measurements are smaller than Cirrus at thinner RNFL values but larger at thicker RNFL values.

Conclusions: RNFL thickness measurements between Stratus OCT and Cirrus OCT cannot be directly compared. Clinicians should be aware that measurements are generally higher with Stratus than with Cirrus except when the RNFL is very thin, as in severe glaucoma. This difference must be taken into account if comparing Stratus measurements with Cirrus measurements.

Citing Articles

Retinal Ganglion Cell Functional Recovery after Intraocular Pressure Lowering Treatment Using Prostaglandin Analogs in Glaucoma Suspects: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Tirsi A, Gliagias V, Sheha H, Patel B, Moehringer J, Tsai J J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2024; 17(4):178-190.

PMID: 38269268 PMC: 10803274. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1423.


Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Values Using Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT.

Rabiolo A, Fantaguzzi F, Montesano G, Brambati M, Sacconi R, Gelormini F Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022; 11(6):27.

PMID: 35767273 PMC: 9251790. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.6.27.


Study of correlation between stereopsis and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in cases of glaucoma.

Dhar S, Raji K, Sandeep S, Abhijit Med J Armed Forces India. 2021; 77(1):63-69.

PMID: 33487868 PMC: 7809574. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.01.004.


Ocular biometric measurements and optical coherence tomography parameters in children with refractive errors and emmetropia.

Kavitha V, Mahesha S, Narendran B, Heralgi M Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(2):290-295.

PMID: 33463576 PMC: 7933838. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_385_20.


Comparison of Drusen Volume Assessed by Two Different OCT Devices.

Beck M, Joshi D, Berger L, Klose G, De Zanet S, Mosinska A J Clin Med. 2020; 9(8).

PMID: 32824455 PMC: 7464253. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082657.


References
1.
Schuman J, Hertzmark E, Hee M, WILKINS J, Coker J, Puliafito C . Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103(11):1889-98. PMC: 1939724. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30410-7. View

2.
Schuman J, Hee M, Puliafito C, Wong C, Lin C, Hertzmark E . Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113(5):586-96. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100050054031. View

3.
Schuman J, Pedut-Kloizman T, Pakter H, Wang N, Guedes V, Huang L . Optical coherence tomography and histologic measurements of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48(8):3645-54. PMC: 2034325. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0876. View

4.
Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Zuppardi E, Falconio G, Doronzo E, Mastropasqua L . Reliability of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110(1):190-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01296-4. View

5.
Bourne R, Medeiros F, Bowd C, Jahanbakhsh K, Zangwill L, Weinreb R . Comparability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements of optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46(4):1280-5. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1000. View