Analysis and Cytologic Characterization of Hemocytes from Freshwater Mussels (Quadrula Sp.)
Overview
Veterinary Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Freshwater mussels are among the most endangered taxa in North America and minimally invasive techniques to evaluate their health are needed.
Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a standardized approach for identifying and enumerating the cellular components of freshwater mussel hemolymph.
Methods: Hemocyte clumping, total hemocyte count, and hemocyte morphology were compared in untreated hemolymph or hemolymph treated with formalin, sodium citrate, sodium heparin, EDTA, water, or l-cysteine. Morphology was then used to categorize hemocytes and perform a 100-cell differential.
Results: Treatment with formalin or >25 mg/mL l-cysteine reduced hemocyte clumping, although only formalin significantly increased the total hemocyte count. However, formalin also induced crenation that impaired hemocyte identification. Both EDTA and sodium citrate-induced hemocyte degranulation while sodium citrate and >40 mg/mL l-cysteine-induced cell lysis. Hemocytes could be categorized into 2 groups of granulocytes (eosinophilic or basophilic) and 2 groups of agranulocytes (large or small) for performing a cytologic differential. The differential was not significantly altered by anticoagulant treatments providing cell morphology was adequate for obtaining a differential. Eosinophilic granulocytes predominated (59%) with fewer large agranulocytes (27%) and basophilic granulocytes (13%). Small agranulocytes comprised 2% of the total population.
Conclusions: No single treatment provided an optimal method to evaluate freshwater mussel hemolymph. Maximal hemocyte counts were obtained following formalin treatment. l-cysteine reduced clumping and maintained hemocyte morphology for performing a cytologic differential. These techniques provide a standardized approach for the hematologic evaluation of freshwater mussels.
Da Silva Neto J, Hardman R, Engman A, Dinkins G, Lane T, Fry M PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0301250.
PMID: 39190757 PMC: 11349219. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301250.
Bivalve Haemocyte Subpopulations: A Review.
de la Ballina N, Maresca F, Cao A, Villalba A Front Immunol. 2022; 13:826255.
PMID: 35464425 PMC: 9024128. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.826255.
Hurley-Sanders J, Levine J, Nelson S, Law J, Showers W, Stoskopf M Conserv Physiol. 2016; 3(1):cov023.
PMID: 27293708 PMC: 4778454. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cov023.